Skip to main content

View Diary: The Second Amendment was Ratified to Preserve Slavery (294 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Which means pretty obviously that (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Dallasdoc, RFK Lives, Smoh, JayBat, blueness

    the states have discretion. Don't use words like never, unless you mean it.

    It is so explicit and obvious that a collective right was conferred by the second amendment, your comment that it was never, ever intended as such is glaringly overzealous.

    The "necessity" is a well regulated militia. Don't deny that obvious truth.

    •  Not after incorporation. The 14th Amendment (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      gerrilea

      guarantees all rights protected under the Federal Constitution to be protected from state infringement as well. The incorporation, however, of that is piecemeal, and occurs in case law. Heller found that the individual right is guaranteed by the 2nd (and presented ample historical precedent for such), and MacDonald incorporated that right using the 14th.

      Furthermore, "explicit and obvious" are words used by people without citations to back it up. gerrilea has provided ample citations disproving what you assert to be explicit and obvious.

      Non enim propter gloriam, diuicias aut honores pugnamus set propter libertatem solummodo quam Nemo bonus nisi simul cum vita amittit. -Declaration of Arbroath

      by Robobagpiper on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 06:17:15 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Then why is it listd with other individual rights? (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      gerrilea, Cedwyn, sensetolisten

      It is so explicit and obvious that a collective right was conferred by the second amendment,

      if that was so, then why is it listed as #2 in a list of individual rights? All of the other rights in the Bill of rights are individual rights, not group rights.
      (yes I know these are now also corporate rights, snicker)
      Why isn't it obvious to the SCOTUS and a liberal POTUS?
      Parsing the words of the 2d amendment is like arguing over how many angels dance on the head of th pin. Either do something about it or not, standing and demanding that people go by your interpretation of it won't do it

      Happy just to be alive

      by exlrrp on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 06:22:43 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  I will deny your attempts to claim that white is (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      sensetolisten

      now black.  You're "obvious" truth is meaningless in the context of the historical records I've presented and established.

      HELL, even if I were to accept YOUR intentional re-write of history as valid, YOU then fail to understand the purpose and INTENT of the Bill Of Rights AND the constitution itself.

      The Constitution confers limited authorities to the central government to do business and direct the general political needs of the States.

      The Bill of Rights enumerates specific exceptions to unalienable rights that pre-exist nor are created by said piece of paper.  Every American is born with those rights whether or not we have a government we created to protect them.  

      Therefore, the 2nd A MUST be understood as granting the one exception when the central government can regulate arms, during militia service, not before or after.  And only those citizens defined as "militia members" would be subject to that limited "regulating" power of the central government.

      Note it does not say anything about women, children, doctors, lawyers, priests, etc, etc, etc.

      I'm glad you gave me the opportunity to explain this to you today.

      -7.62; -5.95 The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.~Tesla

      by gerrilea on Wed Jan 16, 2013 at 06:26:08 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site