Skip to main content

View Diary: 5 Dead in New Mexico Shooting (Updated New Info) (52 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  It's the work of generations (16+ / 0-)

    This is why there is no easy answer.  Nothing enacted would instantly create a change.   But you have to start changing the culture of expectation around guns.

    Success won't be determined by tomorrow, it will be determined by about 15 years from now and the expectations of the culture.   That's how it works.  

    The NRA has successfully framed the argument that 'none of this impacts' and then trots out the crime statistics of the next 6 months.  That standard will mean all changes will fail.  

    Instead, we have to ask: what changes of expectation and availability occur over the next ten years.  Twenty years.

    If we let them keep framing the debate as they do, then you can never make a case for any change, ever.

    Gandhi's Seven Sins: Wealth without work; Pleasure without conscience; Knowledge without character; Commerce without morality; Science without humanity; Worship without sacrifice; Politics without principle

    by Chris Reeves on Sun Jan 20, 2013 at 12:37:20 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  I said the same thing yesterday. (5+ / 0-)

      The problem I'm worried about is the RWGN saying 6 months after laws are passed, (see, it didn't change anything".  And then the laws are reversed.

      Cats are better than therapy, and I'm a therapist.

      by Smoh on Sun Jan 20, 2013 at 02:19:34 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  The NRA and their supporters in Congress (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      splashy, DefendOurConstitution

      forbid the research into gun violence and gun ownership at all levels.  President Obama included research in his measures last week, but I'm sure the Republican House will reduce funding to agencies so they can't carry out studies, just like happened in the 90's.  If we can't do research, we can't say what works and the NRA will continue to say nothing works so pass the ammunition.  There won't be data to refute them, and sadly it's Democrats who want data to back up their positions - Republicans never let a lack of data stop them (and they claim data has a liberal bias so it should be skewed or ignored anyway).

      •  One bone to pick: those are not supporters in (0+ / 0-)

        Congress, they are bought/terrorized into submission so that they are servants of the NRA.

        Then they came for me - and by that time there was nobody left to speak up.

        by DefendOurConstitution on Mon Jan 21, 2013 at 04:54:55 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  They still support the agenda (0+ / 0-)

          whatever their motivation.  The guy from Texas who has suggested impeaching Obama over his gun proposals isn't bought/terrorized into submission - he's a full-on fan.  There are some who are afraid of primaries financed by opponents, but there are others who have guns in their family (Senator Manchin, Senator Tester) who aren't cowed by the NRA but are members.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (134)
  • Community (62)
  • Elections (40)
  • 2016 (38)
  • Environment (36)
  • Bernie Sanders (35)
  • Hillary Clinton (30)
  • Culture (30)
  • Republicans (29)
  • Media (29)
  • Climate Change (27)
  • Education (23)
  • Spam (23)
  • Congress (23)
  • Civil Rights (22)
  • Labor (21)
  • Barack Obama (21)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (21)
  • Law (20)
  • Texas (20)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site