Skip to main content

View Diary: Assault Weapons Question (73 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  humor noted . . . (0+ / 0-)

    and I agree . . . the "self-protection" argument gets pretty thin past 10 yards, up to which a fat pistol caliber or a shotgun makes far more sense.  But the "assault weapon for protection" argument does appeal to, and is targeted at, the "survivalist" defending his stash against the maurading gangs come to take it.  That's even the "vision" that led to Newtown . . . she apparently had (articulated that she had) those weapons because "after the collapse" . . .

    Now . . . how to explain to people (without alienating and antagonizing them) that that's not an entirely plausable scenario ? ? ?

    Fake Left, Drive Right . . . not my idea of a Democrat . . .

    by Deward Hastings on Mon Jan 21, 2013 at 10:19:26 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (149)
  • Community (68)
  • Elections (34)
  • Media (33)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (31)
  • Environment (30)
  • 2016 (29)
  • Culture (29)
  • Law (29)
  • Civil Rights (28)
  • Barack Obama (25)
  • Science (25)
  • Hillary Clinton (24)
  • Climate Change (23)
  • Republicans (23)
  • Labor (23)
  • Economy (21)
  • Marriage Equality (19)
  • Josh Duggar (19)
  • Jeb Bush (18)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site