Skip to main content

View Diary: The clear way forward on filibuster reform: The constitutional option (105 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  making the opposition get 41 NOes (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bear83, grayday101

    is definitely better than making the majority produce 60 yeses ...The Dems would never be able to get 60 yes votes... look at all the failures due to the lack of 60 yes to cloture votes

    This puts the burden on the party that wants it ...

    I think I like this better than the talking filibuster ... you don't have a martyr up there spouting nonsense ...no Romantic Jimmy Stewart type ...

    the house just passed the debt limit bill and it's on to the Senate ...   so let's get the rules in place...

    The rule should have always been 41 votes in the chamber to block it ...

    Give your heart a real workout! Love your enemies!

    by moonbatlulu on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 10:30:05 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  There are GOP Senators who look like Jimmy ... (0+ / 0-)

      ... Stewart? And sure, let some ultra-conservative get up and read recipes or the phonebook. Time after time, 'til the Senate freezes over. That, at least for a while, would be newsworthy confrontation and the media might start covering the gridlock in DC for the partisan non-activity that it is.

      On the merits, do you think the obdurate and dedicated Mitch McConnell, who has been the effective leader of the US Senate for the last several years, can't muster 41 Republicans any damn time he has to?

      2014 IS COMING. Build up the Senate. Win back the House : 17 seats. Plus!

      by TRPChicago on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 11:21:48 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  yes, McConnell can muster 41 votes initially (0+ / 0-)

        but he has to keep them ...and no, I don't think he can keep them very long .... as soon as 41 noes are not on the floor of the Senate the filibuster is over ...

        Give your heart a real workout! Love your enemies!

        by moonbatlulu on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 11:41:59 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Will the proposal - yet to be seen - require 41... (0+ / 0-)

          ... continual presences on the floor?

          But even if it does, wouldn't that necessitate the majority having at least that many, plus one, on the floor or very nearby at all times? Otherwise, anyone could call the question and vote.

          Why do I doubt that that this archaic, ossified, anti-deliberative body - where members of both parties and independents cherish the value of No! - would require what we think it would require? Just sayin'.

          2014 IS COMING. Build up the Senate. Win back the House : 17 seats. Plus!

          by TRPChicago on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 02:10:47 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (129)
  • Community (64)
  • Elections (24)
  • Media (23)
  • Environment (23)
  • Civil Rights (22)
  • Culture (22)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (21)
  • Science (21)
  • Law (21)
  • Josh Duggar (20)
  • Labor (18)
  • Economy (17)
  • Bernie Sanders (16)
  • Ireland (16)
  • Marriage Equality (16)
  • 2016 (15)
  • Hillary Clinton (15)
  • Climate Change (15)
  • Rescued (15)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site