Skip to main content

View Diary: Breaking: Panetta opens combat roles to women (72 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  C'mon. This should not be HR'ed (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    CJB, pravin

    Aargh may have raised an uncomfortable point, aargh 's reasoning might be said to be thin gruel, but the point was made respectfully. It ought to be a legitimate topic for discussion.

    •  For this reason, (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      pravin, Quicklund

      I didn't HR.  I think it's edifying when these conversations remain visible.  I think that aargh is a sexist weenie, but I'm more than willing to discuss that.

      Can you call yourself a real liberal if you aren't reading driftglass?

      by CJB on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 06:40:26 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Facts are right but conclusion is wrong (0+ / 0-)

        There's no denying in nature the general idea is males take the risk so females have to face less risk. But we are not discussing nature, we are discussing the human invention of war.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (127)
  • Community (60)
  • Elections (32)
  • Media (32)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (30)
  • 2016 (29)
  • Law (28)
  • Environment (27)
  • Civil Rights (26)
  • Culture (24)
  • Barack Obama (24)
  • Hillary Clinton (23)
  • Republicans (22)
  • Science (21)
  • Climate Change (21)
  • Economy (19)
  • Labor (19)
  • Jeb Bush (18)
  • Josh Duggar (18)
  • Marriage Equality (17)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site