Skip to main content

View Diary: Stop saying Republican electoral-vote rigging is constitutional. It's not. Here's why. (193 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Another item if I may (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    scrivener76

    (and this was touched on up above)

    Courts sometimes admit there's an unfairness, yet find themselves unable to prescribe a remedy.

    Cases involving gerrymandering have already gone to SCOTUS and ended just like that, or partially like that. Which isn't really surprising -- laying out fair electoral maps is extremely hard.

    For the court to lay out a remedy for a gerrymander means either drawing a map themselves, or sending the original drawers back to make another map, or assigning an independent body ... blah blah blah .. it's a horrid mess. Courts hate even getting involved.

    But what Republicans are doing is tying a gerrymander to Electoral Vote division. It is the tie that can be challenged, and which has a simple remedy (i.e. remove it and go back to the usual winner-takes-all).

    That's a much simpler scenario. No mess, no fuss ... very easy for the courts to handle.

    "What could BPossibly go wrong??" -RLMiller "God is just pretend." - eru

    by nosleep4u on Tue Jan 29, 2013 at 03:35:01 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (131)
  • Community (62)
  • Elections (39)
  • 2016 (37)
  • Environment (36)
  • Bernie Sanders (35)
  • Culture (30)
  • Hillary Clinton (30)
  • Media (29)
  • Republicans (29)
  • Climate Change (27)
  • Spam (23)
  • Education (23)
  • Congress (23)
  • Civil Rights (22)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (21)
  • Labor (21)
  • Barack Obama (21)
  • Texas (20)
  • Law (20)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site