Skip to main content

View Diary: This is why I carry a gun when I can. (219 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  You may need to start over , (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Beetwasher, coquiero

    you have lost the thread , you have misunderstood what is and is not being said and you have jumped to and are sticking with some interesting positions .

    It seems now that its been pointed out to you
    that you are misunderstanding intentionally .
    If that's the case , I'll say that's just a silly little game .
    If on the other hand , if you really don't get whats going on and would like a fuller explanation , just let me know and I will see if I can break it down step by step so that you might just be able to see and understand .

    "Drop the name-calling." Meteor Blades 2/4/11

    by indycam on Wed Jan 30, 2013 at 07:33:45 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Thank you, but I believe I've followed the thread (0+ / 0-)

      line just fine.

      There have been various efforts to create an alternative hypothesis to "she walked" and by extension undermine the possibility that the young woman met with foul play while afoot.  The evidence from readily available links up-thread or one's own separate research on this would otherwise lead sensible people to conclude that the non-walking argument fails -- leaving the essential premise of that counter-argument in tatters and entirely irrespective of the secondary "foul-play" conclusion .

      To some the basic facts and logic relied upon in a community discussion matter and instead of owning up when you seem to have gone astray, you would apparently play the silly game of pointing the finger elsewhere.  That is the projection technique ... is it not?

      Oh well. Please take the next and last word.  It's all yours.

      •  You believe and I know . (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        You headed off course and remain off course .
        You have been informed and you refuse to see the truth .

        "There's none so blind as those who will not see."

        See , here is the problem with your thinking ,

        that the non-walking argument fails
        I never made a " non-walking argument" ,
        you only think I did , that's where the failure is .
        You lost the thread when you failed to understand .
        It was pointed out to you and you steadfastly refused to see .

        Keep on going down the wrong path ,  it bothers me not one bit
        that you are off course , I tried to help you but you don't / can't take it .

        "Drop the name-calling." Meteor Blades 2/4/11

        by indycam on Wed Jan 30, 2013 at 01:39:17 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site