Skip to main content

View Diary: A 'carbon bomb' at the top of Keystone XL Pipeline (63 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  4.5 million barrels a day for 85 years. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Study looked at only " new Greenpeace report ranking potential carbon emissions" and doesnt account for the destruction of the Muskeag ecosystem and the probably doesnt account for the release of C02 and methane caused by the destruction of the Muskeag.

    Your link is broken

    Greenpeace ranked Tar Sands 5th in the world........

    And methane is only used in the study twice, never in conjunction with Alberta or Muskeag destruction.

    Yes coal is worse.

    FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

    by Roger Fox on Mon Feb 04, 2013 at 07:50:24 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Yes, agree coal is considered to be worse in (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Roger Fox, aliasalias

      this report. The report wants us all to consider the total global pollution. Also they consider the Tar Sands already underway whereas some of the coal projects aren't "fully realized."

      To thine ownself be true

      by Agathena on Mon Feb 04, 2013 at 08:03:42 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site