Skip to main content

View Diary: Obama's proposal to raise the minimum wage collides immediately with usual Republican malarkey (171 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  SOTU (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Cassandra Waites, avsp

    He almost said it, but not quite.  The words were in the same sentence, just not together.

    I think that the 'minimum wage' should be indexed to the poverty level, not to inflation.  Income tax brackets should be as well.

    We're all just monkeys burning in hell.

    by smokeymonkey on Wed Feb 13, 2013 at 09:49:54 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Why indexed to poverty level? (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Meteor Blades

      It is adjusted to inflation and Consumer Price Index, so the effect would presumably be similar.

      "No one life is more important than another. No one voice is more valid than another. Each life is a treasure. Each voice deserves to be heard." Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse & Onomastic

      by Catte Nappe on Wed Feb 13, 2013 at 10:18:59 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Pardon my french, (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      but seeing as how we're now indexing the federal estate tax to inflation, why the fuck aren't we doing the same with the federal minimum wage?

      -8.88, -9.59 In the practice of tolerance, one's enemy is the best teacher. -Tenzin Gyatso, H.H. the Dalai Lama

      by BobSoperJr on Wed Feb 13, 2013 at 10:41:52 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Not a good idea. (0+ / 0-)

      When poverty goes up, it is because more people are unemployed.

      How does raising the Minimum Wage help an unemployed man?  Nobody will hire him at $7/ do you expect him to find a job that pays $8/hr?

      •  Because they need a new employee (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Catte Nappe, schnecke21

        to do more work.  Unemployment isn't as high as it is because companies don't want to pay more for employees, it's because they don't need more people to do work.

      •  Your "reasoning" is too simplistic. (4+ / 0-)

        A higher minimum wage does more -- much more -- for the economy than it does simply for the worker who is paid that wage. It's the multiplier effect. That minimum wage worker spends essentially all of his raise. This increases net consumer demand. More demand means more production to satisfy it, which means more jobs. Prosperity for the middle class breeds more prosperity.

        Your view logically leads to every worker being paid just enough to survive, but not enough to thrive. Granted, this situation would be best for you, personally. Why should you pay an extra dollar to a worker who will just blow it all on things like rent, food, clothing, education, consumer goods, etc? Surely, it's better for you personally to keep that dollar for yourself.

        But the question is this: What is best for the rest of the country?

        Note to Boehner and McConnell: "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." --Bob Dylan-- (-7.25, -6.21)

        by Tim DeLaney on Wed Feb 13, 2013 at 12:37:54 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (137)
  • Community (67)
  • Elections (26)
  • Environment (25)
  • Culture (24)
  • Media (23)
  • Science (22)
  • Civil Rights (22)
  • Law (22)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (21)
  • Josh Duggar (20)
  • Labor (19)
  • Economy (19)
  • Ireland (17)
  • Rescued (17)
  • Memorial Day (17)
  • Marriage Equality (17)
  • Bernie Sanders (16)
  • Republicans (16)
  • Education (16)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site