Skip to main content

View Diary: [UPDATE] NYT drops Starr bombshell, it disappears, then reappears! (145 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Starr and anyone in OIC = Same thing (4.00)
    Didn't matter who did it. Starr, in charge of the OIC, was responsible for it.

    So you are saying the removal from the website was deliberate?

    I did not receive $ from Ketchum, U.S. Department of Ed or HHS to write this---though I wish I had.

    by Volvo Liberal on Thu Jun 02, 2005 at 10:22:28 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  correct (4.00)
      his office had custody of its papers. any revelation whatsoever of their contents traces back ultimately to his office. there were no burglaries- remember, starr was on the side of the criminals, not hostile to them.
    •  yes, deliberate (4.00)
      they're not supposed to print innuendo/rumor/conjecture as if it were fact.

      unless it's about a D, of course

      I'm not defending them, just speculating on why they did it and what their justification would have been

    •  But maybe the reporter knew (none)
      firsthand, or was told by someone who did know firsthand.

      Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral. ---Paulo Friere

      by Mimikatz on Thu Jun 02, 2005 at 07:14:22 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site