Skip to main content

View Diary: The Many Problems with Maddow's "Hubris" (190 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Libya was bombed on just the threat of Libyan's (0+ / 0-)

    being killed.

    Saddam actually used his chemical weapons against his own people.  War crimes anyone?

    Guess we should've just left hime to his murderous, despotic ways until he killed enough of his subjects to warrant a sternly worded letter.

    •  Absent still having WMD (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      KenBee, a2nite

      there was good reason to go after Saddam - the question was "How"?  Practically no on would have believe Quaddafi could have been taken down the way he was - I always thought it was possible with him and Saddam too.  The next time someone says when you oppose the Iraq War "Well, would you have left him in power?" The answer is simple: he should have gotten what Mubarak and Quaddafi got.  He people should have been to secure their own freedom with our support in the background at best.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site