Skip to main content

View Diary: Obama Voter Fired By Ohio Company Days After Election Files Suit Against Employer (114 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  As soon as I read this comment (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    eXtina, Hey338Too

    I knew where you worked.  But I'm surprised at this -  

    People who still work there
    People still work there?  

    Someone isn't making their plan numbers.

    •  They do have quite the reputation... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      eXtina, Clues

      I was on an employee message board last night, it is very sad to read what's going on there.  It's hard to believe that the company was always at or near the top of "best places to work" lists.

      I did find an interesting link in one of the posts.  It describes a new way that management is  monitoring their employees.  Nothing helps employee morale better than knowing that your emails and social media comments are being archived and data-mined by your employer.

      I haven't been here long enough to be considered a Kossack, does that mean that I'm just a sack?

      by Hey338Too on Thu Feb 21, 2013 at 07:59:41 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Can't believe people aren't afraid to post on (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Hey338Too, Clues

        that message board. Also surprised there is a union.

        "I'm sculpting now. Landscapes mostly." ~ Yogi Bear

        by eXtina on Thu Feb 21, 2013 at 09:05:17 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  They are terrified to post there... (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          ... as you can see, most of the posts are "last resort" kinds of posts.  "I am about to be canned, what should I do?"

          IIRC the site is blocked on employee's work computers by the company's firewall and any attempt to reach the site on company computers is logged and reported.  99% of the comments there are from home computers (the rest are from managers whose computers are allowed to post to the website for trolling purposes).  There is no doubt that the company monitors that site and a couple of other boards run by employees.  It is rare that you will ever see a real name (for obvious reasons) in any post - unless the ex-employee wants to stick it to the company.

          The union has tried to make its presence felt since the company started "changing" in the early 2000's.  Currently the company doesn't recognize the union, and supposedly targets any employee who tries to represent the union within the company.

          Your friend may find it interesting to read the board (not from a company computer), as the information is usually pretty accurate as to when the next layoffs will begin.  Once the layoffs start, the board will document how many people have been affected and which divisions and work sites they come from.  During review "season", your friend can see how other people are being rated (which is usually an indication as to how bad the next round of layoffs is going to be).

          Here's an idea as to how "effective" the company's policies are working in the US:

          The shrinking US employee population courtesy - XXX's annual reports
          and other sources:
          (Also take into account that XXX was buying companies/employees at the same time.)
          XXX stopped reporting US headcount in 2010
          *Alliance Estimate
          2012: *92,000
          2011: *98,000
          2009: 105,000
          2008: 115,000
          2007: 121,000
          2006: 127,000
          2005: 133,789

          Where XXX hired in 2009:
          Asia/Pacific: 13,376
          CEEMEA: 3,988
          Europe: 2,923
          India: 18,873
          Japan: 868
          Latin America: 7,112
          USA: 3,514
          Canada: 820

          I haven't been here long enough to be considered a Kossack, does that mean that I'm just a sack?

          by Hey338Too on Thu Feb 21, 2013 at 09:40:02 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

      •  I've read about that (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Hey338Too, eXtina

        probably in the same place you did.  Given the rampant ineptitude and bare bones staffing, my bet is that it will never work properly or be useful in any way.  They don't need another metric to determine who to get rid of, anyway.  There's a giant number cruncher that identifies who gets the axe, and it's based solely on cost.

        •  Very true... (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          eXtina, Clues

          ... it's all about cost, stock price, dividends, and management incentive plans.  

          The company is pretty good at heuristics, so that program will probably identify more people in the upper echelons of the company than the lower echelons.  After all, who more than the top brass says one thing to employees and another thing to people outside of the company (which should cause that program to flag the brass)?  It will probably lead to a pretty amusing decommissioning of the program because it works too well.

          I haven't been here long enough to be considered a Kossack, does that mean that I'm just a sack?

          by Hey338Too on Thu Feb 21, 2013 at 10:44:08 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site