Skip to main content

View Diary: Why the rich act the way they do (203 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  The actions of the rich, as a group, suck. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mrkvica, sidnora, bigjacbigjacbigjac

    The problem is that the damage done by the "bad" rich is surpassing any good done by the good ones.  Political corruption, corporate personhood, ecological damage, opposition to single payer healthcare, that's all the doing of the wealthy.  Poverty is their decision; without their opposition, we wouldn't have it.  This is the framework within which this diary has meaning.

    Bill Gates is not innocent; he's responsible for job losses for Americans, by pushing the H-1B program to lower his labor cost & raise his profits.  He's also into busting teachers' unions.

    You remind me: I (kind of) know another decent rich person, my former Congressman Jared Polis.  Great liberal.  Even HE, though, balked at the idea of a surcharge on millionaires to help fund the ACA.  I let him have it.  

    I can't tell if you're deliberately missing the point here; there's no problem with rich people who aren't the problem, so it should be obvious those individuals aren't the topic.  We're not complaining about Redford, Turner, Soros, etc.   You have to know that.  But in case you're really sincerely making that argument, I agree with that point (although a bad rich person does much more damage than a bad poor person)(personally I'd like to see wealth as an aggravating factor in sentencing, rather than the ability to lawyer one's way out of any crime).

    Sometimes I can't believe it; I'm movin' past the feelin'...

    by Leftcandid on Tue Feb 26, 2013 at 07:23:10 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  This is simply (0+ / 0-)

      denying reality:

      Poverty is their decision; without their opposition, we wouldn't have it
      Poverty is, alas, a human condition. Working to minimize it is nobel. Denying it's permanence is naive.
      Political corruption
      Blame the politicians who are corrupted.
      corporate personhood
      Supreme Court decision.
      ecological damage
      Caused by the rich?
      opposition to single payer healthcare
      A LOT of people, like over half the country, oppose that.

      People can be rich and incorrect without being evil. You have a problem with certain rich people's politics and personal decisions. Fine. But "rich people" do not suck anymore than the rest of us.

      •  You really don't understand what has happened (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        and how it happened, who chose it.  Everything on your list above is true ONLY BECAUSE the solutions are vigorously opposed by the rich.  

        Poverty is a human condition... that could now be solved if only the wealthy approved.  Instead they cry, "Socialism!"  Sure, some don't, but too many do.

        The reason the Supreme Court has ruled for corporate personhood for 150 years is a corrupt sympathy with the rich in each case.   Corporate entities sought equal protection under the 14th Amendment, and the SCOTUS clerk who inserted a pro-personhood clause into the Santa Clara County Vs. Southern Pacific Railroad decision was previously a railroad executive.

        The definition of corruption is the profit motive at work in government: the desire to get rich by serving the rich instead of the public.  This is the motive behind everything the Republicans do.

        People oppose single payer only because of wealth-funded propaganda.  Once they understand you're talking about Medicare, they support it.

        I see you left out environmental destruction.  This is something actually perpetrated by humanity at all wealth levels, but the worst of it--the most efficient, largest scale--is done by corporations, aka the rich.

        Not all rich people are bad, but all the people who are causing our worst problems--and who are aware of and capable of implementing solutions instead--are rich.  All of them.  And it ought to be obvious that, morally, it is much worse to be a greedy rich person than a greedy poor person.

        Sometimes I can't believe it; I'm movin' past the feelin'...

        by Leftcandid on Wed Feb 27, 2013 at 05:23:59 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  one question (0+ / 0-)

          at a time.

          How could the wealthy (although they are not some collective of single minded lockstep thinking auto bots) alleviate poverty " if only the wealthy approved."?

          Names and solutions?

          •  Alright, what alleviates poverty? (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:

            In the US and other industrialized nations:
            * livable Social Security benefits
            * National health insurance
            * Properly funded, properly run public assistance safety nets for all life circumstances, including unemployment, addiction, domestic violence
            * Living wage + abolition of free trade to protect domestic labor from a surplus condition
            * Rehabilitation-focused penal system
            * Minimally corrupt political & legal system that distributes justice fairly & safely regulates the marketplace
            * Tax code that provides proper government funding while reducing the wealth gap between top & bottom
            * Education system focused on development of citizens capable of pull participation in economic & political life

            In the developing world:
            * Stabilized access to safe water, food, & medicine
            * Minimally corrupt, democratically elected governments that are responsive to the electorate & create a stable regulatory environment for the conduct of a funtional marketplace
            * Investment in the local development of, and ownership by, sustainable resources, agriculture, & industry
            * Abolition of free trade for fair trade to protect domestic farming & labor
            * Properly funded social safety net, and an education system geared toward a national recognition of long term challenges previously ignored by a population too focused on day to day survival (environmental concerns)
            * Tax code to fund the above
            * Where necessary, a public program to reconcile tribalism & similar corrosive cultural problems that threaten the stabilizing structures, if not a descent into outright civil war.

            I'm sure I forgot a few elements.  But these problems all trace to imbalance of power, aka financial resources.

            Sometimes I can't believe it; I'm movin' past the feelin'...

            by Leftcandid on Thu Feb 28, 2013 at 06:55:02 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  Now that is the stuff of which (0+ / 0-)

              great diaries are made.

              And every last one of these line items have been opposed by wealthy interests since time immemorial. The same wealthy interests have also financed propaganda to pull the wool over the eyes of those who would stand to benefit from implementing poverty-alleviating measures.

              liberal bias = failure to validate or sufficiently flatter the conservative narrative on any given subject

              by RockyMtnLib on Fri Mar 01, 2013 at 07:39:50 AM PST

              [ Parent ]

      •  Just to take one of your points (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        shaharazade, bigjacbigjacbigjac

        Because I don't have time to deal with all of them:

        Are you aware that when Obama originally outlined his health care reform program, something like 80% of the country was in favor of single payer healthcare?  It took the (oligarch-funded) Tea Party screaming for a year and the (oligarch-owned) media covering it like it was the second coming to change enough of their minds to allow the insurance companies to get the version they wanted.

        I, too know some moderately rich people. Some of them are very decent people, and some of them are stupid, crass and selfish. But none of them are billionaires. Do you know any billionaires?

        "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself."........ "The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." (yeah, same guy.)

        by sidnora on Wed Feb 27, 2013 at 07:13:24 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Perhaps (0+ / 0-)

          you can provide me with evidence of that 80% figure? I knew health reform, in various forms has hovered around 50 60 for a quite a while.

          I would hardly blame the media for shifts in opinions.

          I do not any billionaires. Do you?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site