Skip to main content

View Diary: Israel Launches 'Palestinian-Only' Bus Lines (152 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Plessy v. Ferguson (9+ / 0-)

    SCOTUS in 1896 upheld, 8-1, a Louisiana law requiring blacks to ride in separate but equal railroad cars "reserved for the coloured race."  Link here.   Some excerpts:  

    A statute which implies merely a legal distinction between the white and colored races -- a distinction which is founded in the color of the two races and which must always exist so long as white men are distinguished from the other race by color -- has no tendency to destroy the legal equality of the two races, or reestablish a state of involuntary servitude. . . . .

    The object of the [14th] amendment was undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law, but, in the nature of things, it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either. Laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. . . . .

    We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff's argument to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority.  If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it.

    "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals, now we know that it is bad economics." Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jan. 20, 1937

    by Navy Vet Terp on Sat Mar 02, 2013 at 08:10:11 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site