Skip to main content

View Diary: GunFAIL IX (143 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Quite possibly, yes. (0+ / 0-)

    If male gun owners are significantly more likely to handle their weapons in an unsafe way versus female gun owners, then there would be an argument for setting their hypothetical liability insurance rates in a way that reflects the disproportionate risk between the two groups.

    If this results in a rates disparity of more than 7:1, so be it; my point was purely that such rates could not be calculated against the number of males with gun-related injuries.

    •  Your point is made (0+ / 0-)

      My point is that it starts with the gun owner, but its not just that guns are more often purchased or acquired by men than by women.

      Men are more likely to be the shooter, not just to be the victim. Men are more likely than women to take a gun with them into a bar. Men are more likely than women to commit a violent crime with a gun. Men are more likely to succeed with a suicide attempt when it's made with a gun.

      Women are far less likely to insist on having a gun in the home when the man doesn't want a gun in the home, etc. Women are far less likely to shoot their domestic partners when they try to leave the relationship.

      We know from our cultural practices that if women with guns created an injury/death liability for everyone around them, women would NOT be allowed to have guns.

      "They did not succeed in taking away our voice" - Angelique Kidjo - Opening the Lightning In a Bottle concert at Radio City Music Hall in New York City - 2003

      by LilithGardener on Sat Mar 16, 2013 at 01:59:55 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site