Skip to main content

View Diary: Drunk Teen Fatally Shot For Entering His Neighbor's Home Thinking It Was His Home (141 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  True. But that ain't (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Paul1a

    someone-just-shot-a-gun-that-doesn't-mean-anything drunk.

    Which in my humble opinion is somewhere beyond

    I'm-really-drunk-but-not-so-drunk-that-I-can't-break-into-another-person's-house drunk.

    The story related here is that a young man, successfully broke into someone's house, and still didn't have the brains to be afraid of a gunshot.

    Burden of proof lies with that story.

    Null hypothesis is that that story doesn't add up.

    Ceterum censeo Factionem Republicanam esse delendam.

    by journeyman on Mon Mar 18, 2013 at 10:17:22 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Honestly, the burden of proof does not exist with (0+ / 0-)

      the homeowner, at all, when an intruder is shot inside the home.  

       Someone broke into their home and unless state law proves otherwise, the homeowner is not required to investigate who the person is, why they are there or any other means to then decide if the intruder has a right to be breaking into their home at 2am.  They have a right to defend their life and/or property with lethal force....again, unless state law proves otherwise.  

      A warning shot is also not required, I am almost certain.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site