Skip to main content

View Diary: Dick Durbin's new Social Security reform commission (Social Security Defenders blogathon) (205 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Rostenkowski wasn't on the Commission (0+ / 0-)

    Or Pickle either.
    http://www.ssa.gov/...

    The key word in Gregory's presentation as cited by you is "Committee" as in "Ways and Means Committee" chaired by Rostenkowski in those years and with primary responsibity for the revenue portions of whatever legislation came out of the COMMISSION.

    There was one set of events within the Commission structure, a second involving Ball and Darman when the Commission deadlocked, a third when the Commission voted on the deal worked out between Ball (as proxy for O'Neill) and Darman (proxy for Reagan), a deal that knowingly left a hole, and then a next to final process worked out within the House (and Senate) Committee process where Rostenkowski and Pickle took the lead and inserted the FRA piece,  followed by floor action and signing of the final bill.

    It would seem that after 30 years this whole sequence of events has gotten collapsed into the Greenspan-Tip'N'Ronnie show while obscuring the roles of such folks as Pepper, Rostenkowski and Pickle in the various stages.

    socialsecuritydefender.blogspot.com - SocSec.Defender at gmail.com - founder DK Social Security Defenders group - (hmm is there a theme emerging here?)

    by Bruce Webb on Tue Mar 26, 2013 at 11:01:47 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Okay, let me clarify . . . (0+ / 0-)

      It is spelled out by Ms Gregory, when she references "Committee Democrats" and "Democrats on the Floor."  She is referring to the House Ways and Means Committee when she references "Committee Democrats."

      And for anyone who doesn't know who Rostenkowski was, the committee assignment of both these gentlemen is all their Wikipedia web pages.

      Heck, I remember when Rostenkowski was mobbed by a bunch of senior citizens.  And then later served prison time.  He was 'quite a colorful figure,' as I recall.  And I'm figuring that most folks here know who he was.  (At least those over age 40 or 50.)

      So I don't think there's disagreement on this 'process issue,' regarding the two committee members.

      Mollie

      "Only he who can see the invisible, can do the impossible."-- Frank L. Gaines


      hiddennplainsight

      by musiccitymollie on Wed Mar 27, 2013 at 12:15:12 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  No let ME clarify (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Clem Yeobright

        You start a sub-thread making the following points:

        Retirement age changes in 1983 were the work product of a Democratic Senator.

        That Senator was Claude Pepper and he performed this work with Alan Greenspan when both were members of the Greenspan Commission

        You cite as evidence a Wiki article and a presentation by Janice Gregory who is presented as a staff member of the COMMISSION

        I respond in a semi-rude fashion that:

        Pepper was not at that point a Senator
        This work product (FRA change) was not that of the Commission
        What work DID come out of the Commission was not particularly that of Greenspan, nor by implication that of Pepper

        Your response was to cite the names of three 'staff members', ask whether I knew them, and so clearly implied they all with Gregory worked for the COMMISSION. But immediately turned around and connected two of them to Representatives on a (unspecified by you) COMMITTEE

        Now I suppose it is possible that Ms. Gregory, your source for a number of claims over the last week, was a staffer both for the Greenspan Commission and for a non-Commissioner Representative on Ways and Means, I'll check. What I do know is that your original comment put forth a mini-narrative as follows in response to a new attempt by Durbin to form a Commission

        "well even the original FRA changes in 1983 were the work product of ANOTHER Democratic Senator Claude Pepper working with Alan Greenspan within the context of the Greenspan Commission, per Commission staffer Janice Gregory"

        Which except for spelling 'Pepper', 'Greenspan' and 'Gregory' correctly all this was terribly misleading to most presumed readers, and to say the least did not move the ball down the field.  It seems in my haste to correct the record I may not have slowed down enough to clarify this was not meant as a personal attack on either you or Ms. Gregory (though Wiki took a side blow).

        Be that as it may your subsequent 'clarification' did not seem to ME to clarify much and indeed introduced some muddle about Ms. Gregory's actual role(s) in 1983 and so her status as a first hand authority.

        Somehow in this whole process a little heat was generated when the intent on both sides was to provide light. Well I do rub some people the wrong way and by its very nature friction produces heat. Sometimes useful energy, sometimes not. Here maybe not so much.

        socialsecuritydefender.blogspot.com - SocSec.Defender at gmail.com - founder DK Social Security Defenders group - (hmm is there a theme emerging here?)

        by Bruce Webb on Wed Mar 27, 2013 at 06:31:37 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Staff members of Greenspan Commission (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Clem Yeobright

          socialsecuritydefender.blogspot.com - SocSec.Defender at gmail.com - founder DK Social Security Defenders group - (hmm is there a theme emerging here?)

          by Bruce Webb on Wed Mar 27, 2013 at 07:32:22 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Thanks, Bruce, for the list of staffers. I've (0+ / 0-)

            bookmarked them.

            I have gone back over my transcript, and see that the Moderator, Lisa Mensah, describes them (collectively) as:

            "This team was all involved with the Social Security Greenspan Commission."

            But later describes them individually in keeping with your understanding of their roles.  [IOW, Reno as a Commission Staffer, and the other two, Gregory and Primus, as staffers working with the Commission.]

            So I stand corrected.  Thanks for pointing this out.

            Maybe I'll stick with posting clips of the panel, in the future.  ;-)

            Mollie

            "Only he who can see the invisible, can do the impossible."-- Frank L. Gaines


            hiddennplainsight

            by musiccitymollie on Wed Mar 27, 2013 at 10:29:13 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Pickle shows up a lot in Ball's account (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              Clem Yeobright

              even though not a Commissioner. All involved understood that the end game was in Congress in the hands of the Old Bulls like Rostenkowski and Pickle. As such I am sure there was a LOT of back and forth at the staff level.

              socialsecuritydefender.blogspot.com - SocSec.Defender at gmail.com - founder DK Social Security Defenders group - (hmm is there a theme emerging here?)

              by Bruce Webb on Wed Mar 27, 2013 at 12:33:06 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (126)
  • Community (53)
  • Republicans (35)
  • Environment (33)
  • 2016 (31)
  • Culture (30)
  • Memorial Day (30)
  • Elections (26)
  • Bernie Sanders (26)
  • Media (24)
  • Spam (21)
  • Climate Change (21)
  • GOP (21)
  • Civil Rights (20)
  • Education (20)
  • Labor (20)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (18)
  • Barack Obama (17)
  • Law (17)
  • Economy (17)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site