Skip to main content

View Diary: Mark Kelly Denied 2nd Amendment Rights! (75 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  No he's not (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    a2nite
    hes buying it for the Tucson PD.
    You are deliberately reaching a conclusion that you want to reach despite a lack of evidence.

    What someone does with a gun when they transfer it out of their possession is their private business. That's why it's called a private sale (or private transfer).

    No matter how hard you stretch your claim fails for lack of evidence.

    There is no evidence that Mark Kelly fraudulently sought to use his own background clearance to purchase a weapon for someone who cannot purchase a gun themselves. When he picked up the gun, it will be in his private collection. When he decides he no longer wants any gun in his collection he can privately transfer it to anyone who is not a prohibited person.

    "They did not succeed in taking away our voice" - Angelique Kidjo - Opening the Lightning In a Bottle concert at Radio City Music Hall in New York City - 2003

    by LilithGardener on Tue Mar 26, 2013 at 10:12:29 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site