Skip to main content

View Diary: Social Insecurity (219 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Yeah, I get it. (0+ / 0-)

    First we let them take our productivity/intellect gains then we let them tell us if we want that productivity/intellect gains back by way of them paying more into SS w/o taking more for themselves then ....oh yeah that would make them mad.  So, the result is just don't annoy them and beg them not to cut SS further. Bec. of 1. and 2.

    My point is
    A. they don't deserve more cause they've stolen so much already that they need to put it back in the form of SS w/o taking more out for  themselves, they are already our enemies and have declared war we just keep ignoring it while they slowly (sometimes not so slowly) destroy us, and

    B. manipulating the meaning of words (eg. entitlements) and attaching false negative words (lies) to outcomes (eg. turning SS into a welfare program) is only us rolling over even before the fight.

    We're begging them for the scraps. And being told not to upset them 'cause they'll take the scraps away.

    Sorry, remove the contribution cap, include all forms of income (cap. gains etc.), set a hard cap on payouts to the wealthy and call it RPS - return of productivity stolen.

    They're not so slowly killing us anyway and we are cowering.

    "I freed a thousand slaves, I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves" Harriet Tubman

    by BrianParker14 on Fri Mar 29, 2013 at 06:10:35 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site