Skip to main content

View Diary: The Catch-22 in Chief Justice Roberts' Argument (67 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Excellent point, BarryLasVegas. Wish more people (6+ / 0-)

    would make your point when "traditional marriage and procreation" are trotted out.  

    Another is that traditional marriage was about the transfer of property (woman) from one man (father) to another man (husband).  Sell that.  Oh, Oh I'm sorry, did you say "traditions change?" Exactly.

    I'd almost feel sorry for anyone trying to find a logical argument for traditional marriage except their happily justified discrimination messes with people's lives!

    "In politics stupidity is not a handicap." Napoleon Bonaparte

    by citylights on Fri Mar 29, 2013 at 01:04:56 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  and the "thousands of years of traditions" a (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      mmacdDE, stormicats

      couple of the conservative justices mentioned is actually thousands of years of polygamy -- not "one man, one woman," in the Judeo-Christian tradition (which is the only one most of them recognize). Don't they read the bible? 5773 years and almost 4000 of those filled with polygamy.

      While Democrats work to get more people to vote, Republicans work to ensure those votes won't count.

      by Tamar on Fri Mar 29, 2013 at 07:58:32 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site