Skip to main content

View Diary: Abbreviated Pundit Round-up: CT gun laws and other tales of change (224 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Saving lives should never be the primary goal. (0+ / 0-)

    If saving lives were to be the government's primary goal then we should each be confined to a padded cell because freedom itself means more risk.

    Without the freedom to drive we would be safer.
    Without the freedom to choose to go rock climbing or hiking we would be safer.
    Without the freedom to choose what to eat or do with our bodies we would be safer.
    Without the freedom to decide if we want a split-level or a ranch we would be safer.
    Without the freedom to have a pool or pond on our property we would be safer.

    It is an impossibility to both try to impose safety on others and remain a free people or to claim we hold the rights of  individuals in are regard whatsoever.

    Bloomberging all over rights in an appeal that most frightfully matches "what about the children" is not my ideal of the open-mindedness that should go hand in hand with a liberal outlook on life and politics.

    •  ridiculous philosophy (0+ / 0-)

      saving lives is important.

      "Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies." - Groucho Marx

      by Greg Dworkin on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 08:27:00 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Who said saving lives is not important? (0+ / 0-)

        I certainly did not say that.  I stated it shouldn't be the first and overriding factor for if it were it would be illegal to undertake any risk whatsoever.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site