Skip to main content

View Diary: Socialism — what it isn’t (117 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Why would we move the needle more in (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Calamity Jean, nextstep, DFWmom, Sparhawk

    that direction? Have you been paying attention to Europe lately?

    •  Europe is ahead of the United States... (6+ / 0-)

      in quite a few measures of quality of life.

      The problems they are having are as a result of them acting more like the US.

      The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts. -Bertrand Russell

      by mftalbot on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 06:53:09 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I do know this... (0+ / 0-)

        I've been reading how England treats people who have the same or similar condition as my daughter, and it SUCKS!!!!

        They seized one child with ME from her parents, accusing her of being depressed, and threw her in a mental hospital where she DIED a month later from her illness, that was clearly NOT a mental health condition.

        Another parent was trying to get homebound education for her child, which my child had to do, and was denied by her school.  

        Doctors are refusing to give these patients referrals to specialists, and are reporting them to CPS, blaming them for their children's illnesses.

        Their health system did a study on this condition, and basically said that adaptive pacing is not a good therapy because it's too expensive.   There is no choice with this illness. Adaptive pacing is like eating and breathing.  The translation of this study is, "It's too expensive to admit you are disabled, and therefore, we have decided that you cannot be disabled."   Their preferred treatment -- cognitive behavior therapy (close your eyes, relax and pretend there is no pain), and graded exercise therapy (just exercise harder -- which can cause a vicious flare that can make you sick for days or even weeks), do almost nothing to improve the patient's condition, and yet the medical system says that patient, even though they have no choice than to do just that.  

        So, in certain ways that really count, Europe is not ahead of the United States.  Their medical system denies the existence of reality.

        I wish they were ahead of us, because I believe in socialized medicine, but when it comes to M.E., Europe is failing miserably.   It is so bad that it is making the headlines.

    •  that's a result of financialization (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      The banking cartels have pretty much run amok there; but don't worry, it's on its way here soon enough....

      The "extreme wing" of the Democratic Party is the wing that is hell-bent on protecting the banks and credit card companies. ~ Kos

      by ozsea1 on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 07:48:14 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  It started here. Not Europe. (4+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        unfangus, wasatch, sfbob, JosephK74

        Wall Street set the dominoes falling all across the globe, and American started the neoliberal wave in the early 70s as well, pushing for financial deregulation on a massive scale.

        IOW, America set the cancer in motion and pushed organizations like the World Bank and the WTO to push austerity and anti-labor practices.

        Yeah, we had help. But the prime movers were on Wall Street.

        •  The banking cartels are global in scope (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          Wall St is just one of their many "enterprises"......

          The "extreme wing" of the Democratic Party is the wing that is hell-bent on protecting the banks and credit card companies. ~ Kos

          by ozsea1 on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 11:13:00 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Starting here. (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:

            Global in scope. Which is what I said. Wall Street is just a tag to use instead of trying to name all of the banksters, etc.

            But American capitalists started this disaster and push it on others.

            We're the first great power in the modern era to be economic imperialists. Conquering countries wasn't enough for us. We felt (and still feel) the need to force our economic theories on them, much to their detriment.

            We're drug pushers of the worst kind. And the drug is capitalism.

            •  Capitalism as such isn't the problem (2+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              mftalbot, sargoth

              It is UNREGULATED capitalism which really is to blame...and the philosophy according to which ALL regulation will choke economic growth.

              There's nothing wrong with having a market economy--nothing at all. However it is a game and games need rules as well as ways of enforcing those rules. A completely unregulated market will eventually destroy itself so, in order for it to function as well as it possibly can for the largest number of people, it needs to be regulated by an entity outside of it, namely government.

              Those economists whose views control the way our market economy currently works are extremely resistant to any form of external regulation at all and will tolerate it only when they believe they have no choice but to accept it.

              This view is severely deficient in that it results in the extreme concentration of wealth among a small number of the most greedy. Such as situation cannot possibly be healthy for long-term stability or survival.  Also at work here is the assumption that there is no civil society as such and no social contract and that each individual is or should be effectively on his or her own. Should any misfortune take place well, too bad. Once again, this is not a recipe for long-term stability.

              Both portions of the above create a situation wherein there exist a relatively small number of extremely wealthy individuals, hellbent on protecting their wealth at all costs and an increasingly large number of impoverished and very angry people. We last faced such a situation in the US at the outset of the Great Depression. The reason FDR was so successful in carrying out his program is that he understood that the alternative to redistributing wealth while maintaining a market economy was a revolution, the ultimate results of which would be far beyond anyone's ability to control.

              •  The problem is capitalism itself. (1+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:

                Its very structure creates economic apartheid, unless seriously checked by democracy.

                Which means it's a stupid and irrational vehicle to have in place. It requires endless checks. Smarter to find a vehicle that doesn't need those checks in the first place, one with social justice baked into the pie.

                Also, because of its structure, it redistributes power and wealth to the top of the pyramid. And who controls governments? Those at the top of those pyramids. So, in theory, one could at least make a weak case for having a regulated capitalist system, but in practice, this is impossible. Because the people who own government are capitalists and their interests are to keep those democratic checks at a minimum -- if they allow them at all.

                We had one very brief time when we got some of those checks, and it happened after a major disaster (the Great Depression) and because of that disaster. The further we got away from it, the more traction capitalists got for undoing those checks. In short, we don't get to keep those checks for long, and we only get them after a massive disruption.

                Rinse and repeat.

                We can do better. It's the wrong system from the getgo.

    •  Europe has been moving in the opposite direction. (0+ / 0-)

      Don't be disingenuous.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site