Skip to main content

View Diary: Anonymous Threatens to Reveal Alleged Rapist's ID if Mounted Police Continue to Drag Their Feet (61 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  But if she is under age, aren't the pictures (7+ / 0-)


    Since when is the party that embraces all the top tenets of Satan allowed to call the God shots?--wyvern

    by voracious on Fri Apr 12, 2013 at 01:54:56 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  reading comments on other sites (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      wilderness voice

      She was not underage under Canadian law governing the age of consent  

      •  But this pictures are still illegal and considered (0+ / 0-)

        child pornography under Canadian law.  The problem is the police and Crown's would have to prove that a specific person was in possession of them, or distributed them.  And at least until now, they have not been able to get enough evidence in this regard.

        The fact is we don't actually know how many people saw these pictures and how widely they were distributed.  All we have is the mother's assertion that they "went viral" around the school and were shared by text message.  But how is the mother in a position to know this?

        We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both. - Former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis

        by RageKage on Fri Apr 12, 2013 at 09:11:03 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  you would be surprised how fast news travels (0+ / 0-)

          around a school, particularly among mothers.  As we used to say in the Old Days, "the bad news got home before you did"

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site