Skip to main content

View Diary: To (All) The Millions of High School Seniors with Sour Grapes, Especially Ms. Weiss… (141 comments)

Comment Preferences

    •  MI? I'll tell my daughter to steer clear! (12+ / 0-)

      Funny thing is every year IL recognizes the top 10% of seniors. My daughter had no GPA related honors at her high school but was recognized as top 10% by the State. Her friends who had the top GPAs honors at her high school weren't recognized by the State. I'm not sure the criteria they use because her friends had higher GPAs, lower ACTs, similar sports, and much less volunteer work.

      Most of her friends got into WI and IL, but not MI. My daughter was rejected by WI -- when she would have been 3rd generation -- and deferred by IL. Yet she was accepted in the first batch of MI students. At the time she would have preferred WI over MI, but when she went to visit her friends at WI she realized that that she would have been very unhappy there.

      I think most schools know what they are looking for and have a feel for who will succeed at their school. It just frightens me that MI picked both this woman and my daughter!

      •  U of M alumna here (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        emal, ColoTim, CharlieHipHop

        I was a resident of MI at the time and only applied to state schools (my parents put 6 kids through college).  There was no essay.  I had a 3.8 and somewhere between a 1240 to 1280 (I took them several times and can't remember) SAT and my ACT was very high too.  I applied early and was accepted by early November.  

        I don't know what criteria universities use, and they are probably all different.  I do know they want geographic diversity so that is probably why this east coast kid got into midwest schools.  But families in the northeast especially place high priority on the IV league.  If you just look at the number of applications, not everyone with a 4 point or higher is going to get in.  A kid with a high gpa and SAT's will get into a top university, just maybe not the one at the top of the list.

        That said, this kid is obnoxious and clueless.  Surprise, there are minority kids with high IQ's, high gpa's and high test scores.  Universities do not want clones.  And the whole idea that it's a rat race and that if you are the top of the top, you will get into whatever university you want is not true.  Legacies with big donor parents (think W) take precedence over your little SAT score.

    •  Arrogant entitlement is about the sum of it. (25+ / 0-)

      Claiming it is satire when there simply is no satire evident doesn't work for me. It's a bill of complaints against "everyone else."  

      Princeton has a 7% admission rate. So, she thinks that she is "more qualified" to win the "rat race" and be admitted?

      And let's stop and think a bit. Is this some poor downtrodden youth with no access to the socio/economic ladder?  Hell no. She was a Senate Page and has a close relative employed at the Wall Street Journal, not the least of which to mention is the fact that her "poor little discriminated against white girl" screed fits too neatly into the Fox/Murdoch 24x7 racist agenda.

      Pathetic.

      "The law is meant to be my servant and not my master, still less my torturer and my murderer." -- James Baldwin. July 11, 1966.

      by YucatanMan on Sun Apr 14, 2013 at 01:17:18 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  ah--"has a close relative employed at the Wall (9+ / 0-)

        Street Journal"...that explains how-come we're even listening to this.

      •  I feel for these kids (5+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        dfarrah, emal, boji, ColoTim, orestes1963

        The college admissions process is a giant scam. And The College Board benefits. Kids are told to take AP classes, tests are $87 each. They are urged to take the PSAT and the SAT over and over to improve scores. The. When it's time to Pply they spend money and time on those when many aren't even looked at.

        After they finally get into a school it costs a fortune. I can see how a kid might finally wake up,after driving the self hard for 4 years and realizing they are the same as 60,000 other applicants to their dream school and saying WTF?

        Since when is the party that embraces all the top tenets of Satan allowed to call the God shots?--wyvern

        by voracious on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 07:12:49 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Exactly. They try to live these perfect lives, (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          orestes1963

          have been successful, and then everyone, in this case rejected her.

          Great letter. There is some satire here too. Two moms ...

          She is making fun of the liberal make up of the selection committee.

          Did she deserve it? Who knows. They reject many students with perfect SAT scores every year.

          College has become a total scam. According to one study, 47% of students have no increase in skills after 2 years.

          Another study estimated that 85% of jobs don't need any of the skills learned in college.

          Student debt hit a trillion last year, and it is going up all the time faster than inflation. The colleges are spending much more on recreation and sports than education. Professors are much more likely to be non-tenured than any time in our history.

          If we have a problem in education, it is the college scam be taken on our students and parents.

      •  She is bad at math, that's for sure. (9+ / 0-)

        She applied to 3 Ivies and Vanderbilt.

        Let's say each has a 10% admission rate.

        What's the chance of her getting rejected by all four? (.9 to the 4th power = 65%)

        Why the surprise?

        •  Because she felt she was so much better than (0+ / 0-)

          the other 90% of the applicants at each of the schools.

          Whiny self-pity party definitely.  She can express herself very well in an interview on national TV, which would result in many high-school age kids not being nearly so capable of carrying on intelligent conversation.  Still, I probably commend the Ivies and Vanderbilt for choosing other people and I'm wondering if she will deign to follow through on the offer of admission at my alma mater.  I certainly expect her fellow students to very quickly learn that wherever she attends, it is not her first choice and I hope they treat her appropriately.

          •  WTF? (0+ / 0-)

            Students at colleges that weren't their first choice are deserving of the opprobrium of their fellow students?  I don't know that your alma mater would be very proud of your attitude.

            •  You're assuming "appropriately" means badly. (0+ / 0-)

              I'm referring to it in the spirit of "education".  I received a lesson in a variety of people and cultures that I had only read about starting with my first day on campus.  She needs to also learn that there's a whole variety of people at a state school.  If she brings her self-pitying attitude of having to "settle" for one of the best institutions in the whole world, just because it's not her first choice (but is ranked higher in a recent study than at least one of her schools, though overall ranking doesn't mean as much as ranking in her field of study), I really don't have much sympathy for her and I really wouldn't expect the students to either.  This girl needs to learn there's a real world out there, and I think her education will be much more than what she now plans on.

              •  Yeah, right (0+ / 0-)

                If that were your intention, you failed miserably.  Perhaps you should have gotten more "education" at university.  

                But I think you are merely equivocating.  What, pray tell, should her fellow students teach her?  You know nothing about her background or her exposure to others.  Your comments evince a personal animus towards a teenager you do not know.  Sadly, your education at one of the best institutions in the world (that's a large category you are creating there; perhaps you're not terribly aware of the number of excellent global universities) didn't teach not to draw broad conclusions on minimal information.  
                 

                •  I was basing the rating off the report published (0+ / 0-)

                  here: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/...

                  The Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings employ the world's largest invitation-only academic opinion survey to provide the definitive list of the top 100 most powerful global university brands. A spin-off of the annual World University Rankings, the reputation league table is based on nothing more than subjective judgement - but it is the considered expert judgement of senior, published academics - the people best placed to know the most about excellence in our universities.
                  I'd also say your conclusions about how much I know about her and that I have animus towards her are evidence that you, yourself, judge without information.  I suspect we will continue to disagree about that so no point in carrying that further.
        •  Excellent point. (4+ / 0-)

          Even if you apply to 10 schools with 10% acceptance rates, you still have a 35% chance of being rejected by all ten.

          I think it's a matter of focus.

          From her point of view, she's the smartest kid in her high school. Highest test score, high grades, blah blah blah. Now she can't understand why she didn't get in.

          But look at it from the colleges' point of view. I'll bet the Ivy League schools get thousands or tens of thousands of applications from "the smartest kid in the school." There are lots of high schools out there.

          "Stupid just can't keep its mouth shut." -- SweetAuntFanny's grandmother.

          by Dbug on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 12:23:44 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Big Fish in a Small Pond Syndrome n/t (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Dbug, helpImdrowning

            Writing in all lower-case letters should be a capital offense

            by ebohlman on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 02:52:27 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Exactly. There are a lot of these big fish-little (0+ / 0-)

              pond kids out there who are just not prepared for the reality of the big bad world. On the other hand, she did get her essay in the WSJ and landed an appearance on a nationally televised morning show, so the little fish has done alright.

              "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." - John F. Kennedy -7.8., -6.6

              by helpImdrowning on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 04:49:01 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

          •  But how would a high school kid know all this? (0+ / 0-)

            Of course there are lots of high achievers out there -- but top of the class is a big deal in any school.  Teachers and parents push kids to extreme achievement and foster improbable expectations. Maybe someone should point out the dangers of fighting for things everyone else wants, and instead encourage kids to find their own best paths. Kids can have fun and learn during their high school years.  This aspirational circus and its attendant industries cause unnecessary disillusionment for too many sweet, smart kids.

          •  Aren't you projecting a bit too much? (0+ / 0-)

            It appears she was angry and disappointed when she was rejected, but seems to be quite articulate and reasonable in that interview.  A lot of seniors probably had the same reaction on that fateful day.  Give her a break.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site