Skip to main content

View Diary: Annoying Gun Regulation in CA (91 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Let me get this straight. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    tobendaro

    You think if someone keeps a gun locked up tight in a safe at home, they shouldn't be required to have insurance.

    Then you say, "What if someone breaks into your home and steals your gun and commits a crime with it?" Wait a minute. What happened to the gun secured in a safe?

    Seems to me you can't have both.

    "Stupid just can't keep its mouth shut." -- SweetAuntFanny's grandmother.

    by Dbug on Thu Apr 18, 2013 at 01:21:50 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Are you saying that if a kid jumps your (0+ / 0-)

      six foot fence and operates the automatic cover you had installed over your pool and drowns, you're responsible?

      You took all reasonable precautions to prevent it.

      If someone does come at your gun safe with an acetylene torch and steals your firearms, you're no more at fault.

      If someone car jacks you, and manages to batter open the locked hard case you had your firearms locked in in your trunk, you're no more at fault than if they had driven your stolen car into a crowd.

      BTW - this is the case in all those countries with homicide rates less than a quarter of ours that we envy so greatly (and rightly).

      If you think reasonable precaution = 100% proof against theft, you don't know what the word reasonable means.

      I love you stupid fucking fucks. Now stop poking at the dead cat on the table and get back to the issues.

      by JesseCW on Thu Apr 18, 2013 at 09:20:14 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site