Skip to main content

View Diary: Book review: Michael Lind's 'Land of Promise' (94 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  that's a meaningless statement (0+ / 0-)

    because "constitutional monarch" can mean anything, from holding real political power to holding none at all. and the only thing they all have in common is the lack of term limits and hereditary power. federalists such as adams and hamilton and washington wanted it to be a crime to criticize the president. adams and hamilton also wanted the senate to be for life and hereditary, like the then british house of lords. as vice president, adams was shut down by the senate when he tried to refer to washington as "his majesty." none of this was just accepted as normal. had adams won a second term, this country might not have survived.

    The cold passion for truth hunts in no pack. -Robinson Jeffers

    by Laurence Lewis on Sun Apr 21, 2013 at 09:56:33 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  I thought it obvious (0+ / 0-)

      that we were referring to the British monarch as the basis for comparison, since as you know it was Hamilton's too. And George III, by abusing his power and losing a major chunk of the British empire as a result, became the last British king to be allowed to do that. And of course it's meaningful unless you think "constitutional" has no meaning. What constitutional monarch has arbitrary power? All of them have limited and defined powers.

      I don't know where you get your idea about the Federalists wanting it to be a crime to criticize the president, unless you're referring to the A&S Acts, which came under Adams, years after the constitutional congress. As for Adams wanting to call Washington "You Majesty", so what? It meant nothing. Pompous, of course, but ultimately of no moment, like standing when the president enters the room (something I dislike).

      Oh please don't tell me you think Jefferson was a great statesman and president. He wrote some great things and was a masterful politician but as an elected leader he was awful, knowing nothing about policy. His policies almost did destroy the US by bringing about and leaving us unprepared for the War of 1812 and ruining the economy. And he was a racist imperialist.

      "Liberty without virtue would be no blessing to us" - Benjamin Rush, 1777

      by kovie on Sun Apr 21, 2013 at 10:07:23 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  jefferson was a racist slaveowner (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        RiveroftheWest

        that's not exactly a secret. but the a&s acts were supported by the federalists. including hamilton. who wanted the united states to be a hereditary monarchy, and much less of a constitutional one than even adams wanted. and adams wanted a monarchy like the british monarchy, which was still ruled by george iii, his powers not curtailed. which gets back to the original point: hamilton wanted a monarchy, a nobility, an aristocracy, and his version of capitalism was part of that.

        The cold passion for truth hunts in no pack. -Robinson Jeffers

        by Laurence Lewis on Mon Apr 22, 2013 at 12:08:46 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  You think that the man who wrote 2/3 (0+ / 0-)

          of the Federalist papers, and along with his main co-author Madison was the primary impetus for convening the constitutional convention, wanted a constitutionally unbound hereditary monarch? That's some pretty strong revisionist history you're pushing there. Proof?

          Obviously Hamilton wanted a strong president and central government. I think he was right to want it and that Jefferson was wrong to not want it (although of course his warnings were prescient). But to suggest that Hamilton wanted a de facto tyrant is simply without basis.

          I get it, Jefferson good, Hamilton bad. It's a popular dialectic. But a hugely simplistic and wrong one. Lincoln, TR, FDR and LBJ were Hamiltonians, btw.

          Read Chernow's bio of him someday. It might change your mind. He was actually quite progressive for his time in many ways.

          "Liberty without virtue would be no blessing to us" - Benjamin Rush, 1777

          by kovie on Mon Apr 22, 2013 at 08:37:14 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (134)
  • Community (63)
  • 2016 (52)
  • Environment (42)
  • Elections (38)
  • Republicans (36)
  • Media (36)
  • Hillary Clinton (32)
  • Jeb Bush (30)
  • Iraq (30)
  • Barack Obama (30)
  • Law (29)
  • Climate Change (29)
  • Culture (28)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (26)
  • Civil Rights (26)
  • Labor (21)
  • Economy (21)
  • LGBT (17)
  • Science (17)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site