Skip to main content

View Diary: Baucus out, it's Schweitzer time (134 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Sorry, don't know your jargon. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    RLMiller, smartalek, Kevskos
    I STRONGLY reject the general perception of climate change as an environmental problem to be solved by environmentalists.
    Don't know that I said that, but this is a good example of failing to enlarge a coalition.  

    It's an eeconomic problem, it's an enviromental problem, it's a moral disaster, it's a lot of things.  

    But attributing to me a posiiton that "climate change as an environmental problem to be solved by environmentalists" because I used the words "environmental mass movement" is a bit of a stretch.  You know the subtle words and arguments, but I don't.  I said something "wrong."

    In the end, calling it the super-doer only issue that matters or should matter to anyone, does not necessarily persuade many.  

    Those who are out of a job may see that as the biggest economic issues in their life.  Telling them they are wrong probably won't convince them.    

    Join us on the Black Kos front porch to review news and views written from a black pov—everyone is welcome.

    by TomP on Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 10:20:21 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  wasn't trying to attribute words to you... (0+ / 0-)

      just speaking very generally/spouting off philosophy. I think you're saying that labeling climate change an economic problem is just a rebranding and that more needs to be done to convince people out of jobs that they should join in a climate coalition. (But I don't want to put words in your mouth, so let me know if I'm wrong.) I am listening intently and learning.

      Do the math. #unfrackCal. @RL_Miller

      by RLMiller on Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 10:38:37 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  No, that is not what I am saying. (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        RLMiller, smartalek

        My point is that you know the "truth" that climate change is important, but not every person shares your view.  Reaching others from that position is not always effective because they may know a different "truth" and believe it with as much fervor.  

        That is all.  

        Not talking about rebranding.  

        Do you think opponents of climate change have been effective?  Now we have many people believing it is a myth, agaisnt all evidence.  There are reasons for that, see, e.g., Big Oil, Big Coal, etc..

        I do not know the answers.  The problem when one gets deep into an "issue" (I understand this is more than an "issue") is translating that knowledge to one who lacks the depth.  

        The folks you likely talk to a lot share your views.  Of course, climate change is more improtant than anything else because it means the earth and tremendous damage and death.  Yet, the vast majority do not see it that way.

        I have no magic answers.  But what may be self-apparent to you is not to everyone.  Otherwise the issue would not exist.    

        Join us on the Black Kos front porch to review news and views written from a black pov—everyone is welcome.

        by TomP on Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 10:49:46 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site