Skip to main content

View Diary: Being Against Wars Means You're "Radicalized?" (453 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  h/r for BS etc. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    joe shikspack, mrkvica, gerrilea

    to blithely state that Occupy had guys making bombs with no link or context is to deliberately mislead by implying that Occupy was pro violence.

    •  You're a bully, steve. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      blueyedace2, campionrules

      The context was the comment I was responding to in which Obama and his DOJ were said to be "repressing" occupy.

      Obama would have appreciated occupy except there were some crazy elements to it, so he had to deal with them to save lives and keep it from becoming a political liability.

      And I don't need to link things that are common knowledge, such as the fact that several groups of people were charged with conspiracy to make bombs. There was the bridge, and there was the molotov cocktail makers. They have been discussed at length before.

      You might not like the truth, but you can't HR it.

      Maybe you should HR the person claiming that president Obama is a repressor. Please fix mine.

      I'm afraid that my signature won't match the mood of my comment.

      by heybuddy on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 08:48:02 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site