Skip to main content

View Diary: A Homeless Bill of Rights for California. (22 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  OMG. (7+ / 0-)

    Those poor, poor doctors and other health professionals in countries with a right to health care.  They are FORCED, FORCED, to treat the poor and... the ill!  Why, they might catch an illness themselves!

    My heart goes out to these enslaved people.

    •  The doctors get paid (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      JoeLibertarian

      The rest of us are who has to pay.

      By elevating social welfare to a right, you are telling me that another person has an absolute right to take from my time and talents, which means that I have an absolute obligation to provide it.

      I support social welfare, but not in a way that I have an absolute obligation to provide it as you are suggesting. I don't owe other people something just because they exist.

      (-5.50,-6.67): Left Libertarian
      Leadership doesn't mean taking a straw poll and then just throwing up your hands. -Jyrinx

      by Sparhawk on Thu Apr 25, 2013 at 12:05:30 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  They do. You do. That's the cost of living (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        FogCityJohn, aitchdee, yella dawg

        in a society.

        Refusal to meet your basic social obligations at any time in the last 3 million years, up until just about... NOW.. would have left you abandoned by your band and helpless, alone in a situation where no hominid could survive for more than a month or two at best before succumbing to hunger or predation or illness or injury.

        Your only hope - and it likely would have been slim - would have been to find another group willing to accept you.  If you'd still refused to care for the sick or the lame among the group when possible, though, they'd have exiled you even quicker.

        That's how real Social Darwinism functioned.

        "Paid Activist" is an oxymoron.

        by JesseCW on Thu Apr 25, 2013 at 03:37:44 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  This is where we disagree (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          JoeLibertarian

          And regardless of your opinions of relative obligations, at the end of the day, the producers always have the power to withhold the fruits of their labor to some degree or other.

          There is some level at which people with jobs and income are willing to sacrifice for other people. Beyond that level, you get resentment and rebellion. People get the idea that no matter how hard they work to get ahead, the fruits of those efforts will always be expropriated to satisfy the needs of those who cannot or will not produce.

          (-5.50,-6.67): Left Libertarian
          Leadership doesn't mean taking a straw poll and then just throwing up your hands. -Jyrinx

          by Sparhawk on Thu Apr 25, 2013 at 04:12:13 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  So go Galt. (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            aitchdee, yella dawg

            That's what you're talking about.

            You know, I really don't understand why you bother to hang out on this site.  Your Randian views are repugnant to any progressive.  Surely there is a site where you can worship the Pauls père et fils and where people will applaud your utter lack of empathy and approve of your complete absence of social responsibility.

            But that site isn't DK.

            "Ça c'est une chanson que j'aurais vraiment aimé ne pas avoir écrite." -- Barbara

            by FogCityJohn on Thu Apr 25, 2013 at 09:35:13 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site