Skip to main content

View Diary: Let's Teach the Controversy of Evolution vs Intelligent Design **Updated with Poll question** (365 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Either way, acceptance of science doesn't (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ZedMont

    guarantee a person's rationality. Belief in religion doesn't preclude rationality. That's what history says. History shows societies tend to operate under a belief matrix that evolves, & that individuals in those societies are capable of rational (& irrational) actions under that matrix...hard as that is for many to "believe."

    America's greatest political dynasty...the Kaan

    by catilinus on Mon May 06, 2013 at 04:54:38 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Belief in a religion precludes rationality when it (4+ / 0-)

      comes to the subject of that religion.

      That does not mean it precludes rationality when it comes to all other subjects.

      Wash. Judge Tells Cops To Return Man’s Marijuana Or Be Found In Contempt

      by JesseCW on Tue May 07, 2013 at 05:42:14 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I would have to disagree (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Joieau

        I find it perfectly rational for someone to conclude that belief in an afterlife will make living more comfortable than confronting the idea that there is nothing after death.

        •  and belief in a never-empty bank account (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Thorby Baslim, trumpeter

          will make life more emotionally comfortable for the chronic spender.  Until it is gone.  That is not rational, that is delusional.  We just give religions a pass when it comes to their delusions.

          •  The belief about the never ending bank account (0+ / 0-)

            comes into conflict with reality eventually. The belief in an afterlife? That never comes into conflict with reality. So I think your comparison is inapt.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site