Skip to main content

View Diary: Let's Teach the Controversy of Evolution vs Intelligent Design **Updated with Poll question** (365 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Your logic is based on a false premise. (0+ / 0-)

    Both sequences are designed by a set of governing laws, the first by you, the other by someone else who wrote a "logical" program that generated results. In the first sequence you are the creator, in the second you are the observer, but both sequences where created.

    Again, the very definition of randomness is that there are no governing laws.  If there are no governing laws then it is impossible to predict results.  If results can be predicted then there are governing laws that dictate what the results will be just like your sequences have demonstrated. Just like 1 + 1 = 2 in an ordered universe.  In a random universe 1 + 1 never, ever has the same result because there are no laws that govern the definition of 1.

    If there is no order in the universe, then science is an illusion.  There must be order to have predictable results.

    The scientific method does not extract the nature of the world; it merely reveals the world in higher definition.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site