Skip to main content

View Diary: More evidence of the stupidity of ACA released by the Administration!? (43 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  For me, the big unintended consequences (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    VClib, jec, FG, nextstep

    come from the rules regarding what employees are covered.

    Really, if you have a rule saying, that if you have 49 full time employees you don't have to cover any, and if you have 50 full time employees, you have to cover them all, what do you THINK employers are going to do?

    And if you have a rule that says if an employee works 29 hours, you don't have to cover them, but if they work 30 hours you do, what do you THINK employers are going to do?

    •  Exactly. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      jec

      And it is that easy to understand, which makes it that much more embarrassing for me. This isn't complex economic concepts like derivatives or whatnot, I've got high school dropouts explaining to me how stupid this is using your exact words.

      I'm afraid that my signature won't match the mood of my comment.

      by heybuddy on Wed May 08, 2013 at 08:33:55 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site