Skip to main content

View Diary: The Dangers of Surveillance: Harvard Law point counterpoint (38 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Information gathering is predicated on the (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    CroneWit

    assumption that humans are creatures of habit. Some are and some aren't. In any event, one-off events can't be stopped.
    I don't think information is power. The sequestration of information is a power play, a kind of deprivation that's designed to inflict damage. Doing it in a virtual environment makes no difference because the effect always registers in the perpetrator's gut. The deprivator feels empowered by depriving someone else of something he doesn't even want for himself. Deprivation satisfies, much as does the lie. Whether or not the deception is believed doesn't much matter.
    In a sense, deprivation/deception are lesser evils. Destruction would be worse. But, destruction, being more obvious, is more likely to be intercepted and stopped. So, deprivation/deception (the destruction of the truth) are lesser endeavors, less risky and more likely to succeed. Oh, and they take less effort. Deprivators are lazy.

    We organize governments to deliver services and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Thu Jul 18, 2013 at 02:40:43 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site