#### Comment Preferences

• ##### it will sort itself out(15+ / 0-)

over time.

Maybe miller stays around again, at some point the Dems will get their act together, the state party will crack heads
and run one "Blessed" candidate,

No voting system is ideal.

you can prove mathematically that 5 different voting systems will give 5 different results all less then optimal.

• ##### This!(2+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
Capt Crunch, patbahn

If seven "Democrats" run against each other under this system, they deserve to lose.

Ignorant arrogance.

Cheliabinsk-40

[ Parent ]

• ##### Classic game theory.(3+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
Capt Crunch, patbahn, Chas 981

If they work together, one of them will win.

If they work against one another, they all will lose.

"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist." --Dom Helder Camara, archbishop of Recife

[ Parent ]

• ##### Only in America(0+ / 0-)
5 different voting systems will give 5 different results all less then optimal

What stronger breast-plate than a heart untainted! Thrice is he arm'd, that hath his quarrel just; And he but naked, though lock'd up in steel, Whose conscience with injustice is corrupted. King Henry, scene ii

[ Parent ]

• ##### i once saw a PBS special on voting(2+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
TerryDarc, codairem

where they had an election for voting methods,
and it was a nice way to show how any
preference method would skew the results

frankly I think preference voting schemes are best.
A is my first choice, C is my second choice,  F is my third
and wipe out the ones who fail and stack upwards
but even that wipeout can produce different results
depending upon how you do a wipeout.

• ##### There is surely nothing sacred(2+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
patbahn, codairem

about the winner take all, primary, redistricting, two party crap we've got that produces a house of reps that should be a seriously reduced minority are found instead to be 235:200 (or whatever) Republican.

What stronger breast-plate than a heart untainted! Thrice is he arm'd, that hath his quarrel just; And he but naked, though lock'd up in steel, Whose conscience with injustice is corrupted. King Henry, scene ii

[ Parent ]

• ##### i like having districts(0+ / 0-)

but,  having a choice vote, where i can vote for 1st second
third choice,  and they do some sort of rack and stack.

• ##### Don't mind the districts(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
codairem

but the gaming to put all the dems in one super heavily democratic district while diluting the remaining into safely repug districts leads to the undemocratic bs we've got that only votes to repeal Obamacare every week, seeking only to get re-elected and push their stupidity first agenda on America.

We don't have a democracy: we have a travesty of democracy.

What stronger breast-plate than a heart untainted! Thrice is he arm'd, that hath his quarrel just; And he but naked, though lock'd up in steel, Whose conscience with injustice is corrupted. King Henry, scene ii

[ Parent ]

• ##### the california redistricting to compactness(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
TerryDarc

worked out really well.

nice rational districts, cleared out some deadwood,
made everyone have a decent race.

and the open primary, i think will create some interesting effects.

I think the extremists will have a tough time
with the jungle primary.

• ##### Arrow's theorem(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
patbahn

No voting system involving more than two candidates can be perfectly "fair."

http://en.wikipedia.org/...

We don't want our country back, we want our country FORWARD. --Eclectablog

[ Parent ]

• ##### Range voting is the answer(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
codairem

http://www.amazon.com/...

It's a fair, easy to implement system.  We should do it.

• ##### There's ALWAYS a problem(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
codairem

Range voting allows for "tactical voting" where voters don't express their true preferences.

Not saying it's not superior, merely that it's not a cure-all.

We don't want our country back, we want our country FORWARD. --Eclectablog

[ Parent ]

• ##### In theory, yes, but tactical voting never amounts(0+ / 0-)

to anything in practice.  Santorum didn't win the Repub primary, and Clinton didn't win the Democratic one.

99% of voters will vote their true preferences (to the extent they can figure them out).  It's time we implement ranked voting in all elections.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

• Recommended (155)
• Community (70)
• Elections (36)
• Media (34)
• Law (31)
• Trans-Pacific Partnership (31)
• Civil Rights (30)
• Environment (30)
• 2016 (29)
• Culture (29)
• Barack Obama (25)
• Science (25)
• Climate Change (24)
• Hillary Clinton (24)
• Labor (23)
• Republicans (23)
• Economy (21)
• Josh Duggar (20)
• Health Care (19)
• Marriage Equality (19)