Skip to main content

View Diary: Paved with good intentions: The folly of 'open' electoral primaries (151 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Why do you say the open primary system (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ratcityreprobate

    effectively eliminated third parties?  How did that work?  

    It seems to me intuitively that if anything, open primaries would favor third parties.  

    •  Only the top two advance to the General Election (3+ / 0-)

      whereas before, at least in Seattle, we would see a Socialist Worker candidate, Green Party candidate and an occasional Libertarian in the general. I think small "d" democracy has been diminished when only R's and D's make it to the General. Actually in Seattle, we may never see another R on the ballot in the General for the state legislature or Congress. The General will just be the run-off between two Democrats and in Eastern Washington a run-off between two Republicans.

      •  if you aren't in the top two (0+ / 0-)

        how can you win the election?  If Seattle elections are between a Democrat and a Greenie, and Asotin County elections are between a Republican and a Libertarian, how exactly is that bad for third parties?

        You seem to be entertaining the notion that candidates with no chance of winning have some business being on the ballot.  They don't.

        I want to see Snowden get a fair trial, an impartial jury, and the same sentence James Clapper gets for lying to Congress.

        by happymisanthropy on Mon Jul 29, 2013 at 05:58:58 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Top Two destroys third parties (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Zack from the SFV

      which is why it is being pushed by Republicans in Arizona.
      Top two means there are no third parties on the General election ballot, meaning that voters never hear of reasons to support them.

      Restore the Fourth! Save America!

      by phillies on Sun Jul 28, 2013 at 06:51:49 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I'd find that claim more persuasive (2+ / 0-)

        if I thought there were a significant third party to be "destroyed".  But when third-party candidates get only single-digit percentages under the traditional system, I'd say the voters aren't finding reasons to support them, regardless of the voting system.

        For whatever it's worth, in the 2012 WA state legislative elections (98 house seats & 26 senate races), there were 9 third-party or "No party preference" candidates who made it into the Top Two, and thus onto the November ballot.  They included one Green, one Socialist, one "(R) Hope & Change Party", and 6 who called themselves Independent or said "No Party Preference."

        In addition, there was one "Independent-GOP" (who lost), and one "Independent-Dem" (who won).

        In 25 cases, a single major-party candidate ran unopposed, so a third-party candidate could have made it to the November ballot just by filing.  And in 14 races the Top Two candidates were in the same party.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site