Skip to main content

View Diary: 70-year-old great-grandmother fired for helping free an innocent man (142 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  80 cases is too many cases - the point is (0+ / 0-)

    that the "legal eagles" are human beings and can only take on so much before they start to drop balls - and that's because there's not enough funding to add more human beings to the pool of folks who would work on these cases.

    The point is that our judicial system is both inequitably and poorly funded.

    Anyway, the integrity of the system is important.  Funding the defense options is important.  If you want to protect those families, that is.

    •  You seem to want to monopolize the criticism (0+ / 0-)

      process. That isn't helping the discussion go forward.

      For instance: taking a more sympathetic stance:

      Yes, the working poor, and the barely middle class can also be at the mercy of a broken system. I offer that part of that problem is that when affordable, good lawyers do arise, they are quickly overwhelmed by a huge caseload.

      --totally different tone.

      You still express your frustration from your unique position, without alienating those who are expressing frustration from another angle.

      This fosters the understanding of interdependence of low quality representation, exacerbated by a broken, corrupt system that cannot self regulate at any level and cries out for reform in a multitude of ways.

      Gentlemen, congratulations. You're everything we've come to expect from years of government training (Zed, MIB).

      by GreenMother on Tue Jul 30, 2013 at 08:41:04 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Sigh. (0+ / 0-)

        Right out of the gate when you entered the thread, you decided that I didn't care about the guy because I believe that relying on the kindness of courthouse employees is not a solution to the problem and because I believe that the ethics rules that are in place are there for very good reasons.

        You went after me for not caring about justice which was totally wrong - not wrong for going after me - but wrong in the sense that you drew exactly the wrong conclusion about what I was saying in that particular comment in the thread.

        Then you went on to blame the public defenders and to cast aspersions on lawyers working in this arena.  Again totally your right to think and do that, but you are wrong about what the real problems in our justice system are.

        Like the ethics involved in this particular case of the helpful courthouse worker, the layers upon layers of inequity built into our system right now are complex - but they come down largely to the question of funding and resource allocation.

        The Police and Prosecution generally have healthy budgets.
        The Public Defender system all of the country is under siege and being defunded.
        Public Defenders tend to have no where to go in terms of rising through the ranks whereas Prosecutors tend to be the favorites in appointed and elected judgeships.  
        Most Judges start out as Prosecutors - not PD's - which to me is the most chilling aspect of our criminal justice system having known a few Prosecutors and understanding their biases.
        Juries and the Public are more likely to believe the Police than any other witness in a trial and most jurors tend to believe that the accused would not be in the Defendant's seat if they were not guilt of a crime - or "something".  
        Public Defenders are underpaid and overworked.  
        The Federal Prosecutor's office is suffering no cuts as a result of the Sequester - the Federal Public Defender's office may see cuts in personnel around 40% because of how the Sequester was designed and applied in this area - the Federal Prosecutors are taking advantage of the furlough days when the PD's office is closed, I am told.

        These are all trends that have been in the works for a couple of decades now.  The priority of policies in the judicial system has been trending away from "justice" and trending towards a system that cripples the defense and gives clear advantage to the prosecution.

        Americans confuse "Law and Order" with "Justice".  That's the kind of perverted thinking that saved George Zimmerman's ass after he killed a kid for walking home too slowly (or whatever insanity that defense was).

        I am glad that the lady helped the man successfully petition for a DNA test, but she's not the answer to our ails.  

        I lived in a small, fairly corrupt, third-world country for a while.  It was really taxing and stressful to try to get anything government related done there because the reality was that on most things you had to know and be liked well enough by the lady at the courthouse; the lady at immigration; the lady at customs; the lady at the DMV; the car inspection guy etc. well enough to get through basic government transactions.  Basically, I know what it is like to live in a society where your only hope is finding someone sympathetic to you or your situation - and hope that you or someone close to you hasn't pissed someone off - in order to live your life.  There was nothing remotely just about that environment.  Mostly it was a biased, partial and quixotic experience.  I missed the States a lot on those days when I had to do something involving the government.

        •  No I am just confused why you say you care but (0+ / 0-)

          then seem to jump all over people on the thread. You are all over the place.

          It's not the first time I have seen professionals get proprietary over their profession, when faced with a combination of personal frustration and public criticism.

          Gentlemen, congratulations. You're everything we've come to expect from years of government training (Zed, MIB).

          by GreenMother on Wed Jul 31, 2013 at 05:28:31 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site