Skip to main content

View Diary: THIS is the guy we're counting on to beat Cuccinelli? (41 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  He's the candidate, for better or worse. (10+ / 0-)

    Kind of reminds me of Blagojevich getting through the primary in Illinois. We all knew it was just a matter of time before he fucked up and got caught.

    Maybe Terry will still pull this one out. I hope he at least finishes his term if he does win.

    Calling other DKos members "weenies" is a personal insult and therefore against site rules.

    by Bob Johnson on Fri Aug 02, 2013 at 03:07:59 PM PDT

    •  let's assume for a moment some validity (8+ / 0-)

      to the charges being floated.

      Besides the fact that Hillary's brothers have a bit of history of coloring outside the lines.

      You would then have on the one hand McAuliffe who was involved in pushing the limits on a small scale where if anyone was cheated it was overseas investors versus Cooch who was basically selling his office and in whose voting tried to rip off taxpayers.

       I'm not sure how it plays out.

      And the question might be who if anyone is charged.  And if so, whether it is civil or criminal - and we can look at how rarely the SEC has gone with anything criminal in Wall Street's major rip off of the economy.  Or has the DOJ.

      "We didn't set out to save the world; we set out to wonder how other people are doing and to reflect on how our actions affect other people's hearts." - Pema Chodron

      by teacherken on Fri Aug 02, 2013 at 03:19:22 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  So, one corrupt guy vs another (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        Nobody from any third parties are running? Maybe a grassroots campaign for someone other than these two idiots would do more good than voting for the D.

        •  Just found our, Robert Sarvis (0+ / 0-)

          Ex-Republican, running as a (big-L) Libertarian. I know nothing about him, except that apparently he's getting a lot of the "both these other guys suck" polling.

        •  The seat is too important, and the election too (0+ / 0-)

          close, to play the third party game.  It has to be McAuliffe, because Cuccinelli is way too extreme.

          This is Bush v. Gore, except that McAuliffe is a lot sleazier than Gore ever was or will be, and that Cuccinelli is a thousand times more dangerous than Bush.  If you're in VA, you_have_ to vote for McAuliffe.  And hope that he can get enough others to pull the lever for him as well.

          The alternative is unthinkable.

          When the union's inspiration /Through the workers' blood shall run /There can be no power greater /Anywhere beneath the sun /Solidarity Forever!

          by litho on Sat Aug 03, 2013 at 06:06:04 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  Cmon, he's worse than that (4+ / 0-)

        I do realize that video being peddled about on the commercials is by Americans for (rich people's) Prosperity, but I did watch it and sadly, there's not much there I disagree with.

        Once Perriello bowed out, we were stuck with this bum, but I tell you I'm going to be learning how to cast my vote using my left big toe, because I'm going to need both hands holding my nose at the polls to vote for him.

        Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear. ~William E. Gladstone, 1866

        by absdoggy on Fri Aug 02, 2013 at 04:03:55 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Depends. If this gets nasty, he might have to (0+ / 0-)

      pull out of running.  I mean, they haven't yet had the primary, and until that happens, his name isn't on the ballot.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site