Skip to main content

View Diary: Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos Buys Washington Post for $250M (211 comments)

Comment Preferences

    •  Not so much. In this country, the supreme (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      cotterperson, ericlewis0, Shockwave

      clourt has made it clear that nobody is expected, let along required to pay any maore taxes than the law requires If somebody rights a law that you get a double deduction for all checks written on a typewriter, you'd be a fool not to take advantage of it.

      The entire pissing match over where money is sourced or earned has been a thorn in the side for all taxing authorities for decades and a bone of contention between them. As long as they ae open and up front about what they are doing, and it is within the law, it is hard to call that "dodging".

      That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

      by enhydra lutris on Mon Aug 05, 2013 at 02:59:34 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Yes, a tax dodger but (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      tikkun, ericlewis0, Shockwave

      he elevates it to high art!

      Commenting on the fact that  despite £4.2bn of UK sales, Amazon paid only £2.4m in corporation tax in 2012. In the same year it received £2.5m in government grants.

      Like any really important work of art, it's bound to upset a few people. Just as Banksy causes collateral damage to the neatness of walls, so Amazon's masterpiece is a defacement of the public purse. But it's not just some hooligan's tag, like Google's artless Irish scam. This shows an impish wit and a dark insight. What elevates Amazon's activity is the fact that it applied for government grants. The elegance of that corporate choice is like the ambiguity of the Mona Lisa's smile, the ruthlessness of Mike Tyson's punch and the adaptability of the malaria virus combined. There is no point in criticising anyone or anything that can do that. They can only be admired or destroyed.

      The more you think about it, the more brilliant it is. At first glance, the deftness of securing government funding, which was intended to sustain and encourage marginal businesses, is rather pleasing. The thought of the thousands of small enterprises that could have been nourished and helped to survive by the cash Amazon has swallowed in one tax-cancelling mouthful is challenging and absorbing.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site