Skip to main content

View Diary: Liberal Racism? Charlie Rangel was Wrong to Call the Tea Party a Bunch of "White Crackers" (228 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  You're ascribing motives - that's personal (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    raptavio
    •  Not necessarily when the motives (0+ / 0-)

      are embedded in the context of the argument. If I am making an argument for a particular position I clearly have motives in making that argument. To accuse me of having ulterior motives not related to the position verges on being personal. I did not do that.

      •  Just pointing out how I see it (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        raptavio

        It's one thing to say that one's argument is sanctimonious, but it's over the line to call someone sanctimonious, which is how I read your comment above.  

        But, because it's such a fine line when taking that approach, it's probably better to avoid that kind of charge all together and simply stick to what you perceive to be the flaws that don't raise a personal charge at all, whether "embedded in the context of the argument" or not.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site