Skip to main content

View Diary: Democracy—the original crowdsourcing (120 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I am curious (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    why making a law regarding what news organizations are allowed to do, would violate the first amendment.

    I concede that having the law say you cannot lie, would be untenable (although I would love to hear the debate in congress - how would you argue that lying is a good thing (especially those who proclaim to be Christians, since this is also one of the commandments).

    Regarding the first amendment, I think that if the law was limited to news programs, this could be crafted as citizen protection, and truth in advertising.  After all, no one else gets to make false claims about the product that they produce and sell.  Why should news organizations.

    I think those above who have stated that the law could be around reporting facts, without inference and conclusion, may be a better approach.

    •  I wouldn't argue lying is a good thing ... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      ... It's just not legislatible. And the results, if it were, would be untenable, I think.

      I don't agree with the comment that all editors are cowed by the boards of newspapers. Indeed, most want the patina of objectivity, even if it's not the reality.

      A lot of filtering, conscious or un-, occurs at the reporter level. Sources dry up if you embarrass them or contradict them with actual analysis. Paragraphs get too long when you cover both - or, heaven forbid, all - sides. You run over the time limits assigned to your TV time slot if you cover all aspects, especially when it's You the Reporter and not an authoritative "expert" who's trying to be balanced. And worst of all, most reporters or even anchor people aren't prepared to handle off-the-wall allegations made by guests. (Psst: That is why they concoct them.)

      This NO LIE standard is great, just unrealistic. After all, it's always and only the other side who "lies", right?

      2014 IS COMING. Build up the Senate. Win back the House : 17 seats. Plus!

      by TRPChicago on Sun Aug 11, 2013 at 03:51:03 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Thanks (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        GrumpyOldGeek, TRPChicago

        for your feedback.  It all makes sense.  But I actually disagree with 'it's always and only the other side who "lies", right?'.

        I think both sides have lied, or do lie.  That being said, I think the level, degree and volume of lies told by Fox News, and their ilk, make the lies told by others seems (almost) reasonable by comparison.

        To me, it is an interesting discussion.  How do we get our news sources to do a better job of being honest with the American people.  I have been caught off guard by the things people believe, when questioned, they reference (mostly) Fox News.

        It really does make it harder to have 'United' States, when some relatively large part of the population are fed a daily dose of propaganda masquerading as news.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site