Skip to main content

View Diary: It keeps happening: Faceless Bank's Repo Contractor hauls all of W Va. Woman's possessions to dump (279 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  You may want to rethink that absurd notion (0+ / 0-)
    •  You are wrong. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      VClib, Pi Li

      Being intoxicated makes all the difference.  Lots of states have laws that make it so if being drunk -- rather than being mistaken or careless - is what causes you to do something wrong, THAT is a crime.  There's no "carelessness" or "mistake" here.  The implication is that, if he were sober, he would have recognized that this is not his home.  The only reason this happened is because he was drunk, NOT because of an accident, or a mistake.

      When you are drunk and do something you shouldn't, you generally can't claim that that it was an "accident" or a "mistake" or "negligence" that caused you to the wrong thing.  It was the intoxication that caused you to do the wrong thing.  Intoxication under our system of laws is considered intentional -- getting intoxicated is not an accident or negligence.  

      And look what he was charged with -- criminal trespass, and public drunkenness.  

      Here's the legal definition of criminal trespass:  

      A person is guilty of criminal trespass if he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling or premises, or if he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building or upon real property which is fenced or enclosed in a manner designed to exclude intruders. A person commits criminal trespass who, knowing he does not have the owner’s effective consent to do so, enters or remains on property, or a portion thereof. Laws vary by state, so local laws must be consulted to determine applicable requirements. It is a defense to the crime to show that an element of the crime, such as knowingly entering or remaining without authorization, is lacking. An attempted criminal trespass requires that a defendant act with the intent to commit criminal trespass, and his conduct must constitute a substantial step toward committing the aggravated criminal trespass.
      You can't say, the reason I didn't "know" I did not have consent is that I was drunk.  If you would have known you had no consent if you were sober, that's no defense.

      On the other hand, if you have "effective permission" (like foreclosure) to enter house 1, and you make a mistake and go into house 2 THINKING it was house 1 (like you got the address wrong) that's not done knowingly.  You can be sued, but generally it's not a crime you go to jail for.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site