Skip to main content

View Diary: Kerry's speech was unconvincing and inaccurate (154 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm not cherry picking (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    fran1, protectspice

    I even referenced the UN position.

    It was you in your original comment that named del Ponte's position. I felt you somewhat misrepresented that position when you said:

    Del Ponte also was clear that there's no conclusive either way
    So I merely cited her own words to demonstrate that her position wasn't precisely clear at all.

    Now, as to the UN's final report, and whether or not it's merely interesting, or "CRITICAL", as you claim, is not known to me.

    I'm not privy to the actual evidence del Ponte acquired, or what political forces were involved not only in undermining her position, but in effectively silencing her since.

    If you think there wasn't immense political pressure on Ban and other UN officials to retract del Ponte's report and throw her under the bus, then we have nothing more to discuss.

    Is that what happened here? I don't know. But I have a bit of a bias for the fish swimming against the current. Everyone knows the major powers want an excuse to attack Syria. And a nice CW attack is all they need.

    Del Ponte would have done herself well by just going with the tide, and reporting what the State Sept. wnated her to.

    But she didn't. I think she has integrity and told the truth. Obviously, that's just a gut feeling, and so I won't base any hard conclusions on it. But I won't ignore it either.

    •  Take a look at the UN report then (0+ / 0-)

      the latest report from the commission is linked in my original comment.  It is the document I quote from.

      http://www.ohchr.org/...

      Also, the comment by DelPonte in an interview by Isabelle Kumar can be found here

      http://www.euronews.com/...

      Isabelle Kumar, euronews:

      Back in May you caused some controversy with your statements when you said there was evidence that the rebels had been using chemical weapons, do you regret having said that?

      Carla del Ponte:

      No absolutely not and I confirm that, but of course there is not conclusive evidence. There are first elements of an investigation and so let’s see what will happen during the investigation but we have some elements, of course, otherwise I would not speak about it.

      Isabelle Kumar, euronews:

      But the evidence seems to show that the chemical weapons are used more by the regime than by the rebels.

      Carla del Ponte:

      I don’t know. Now it is time to wait and to have the final results of the investigation.

      Also, in the story reported by the BBC
      Note that the Commission of Inquiry itself quickly repudiated her remarks:
      Carla Del Ponte told Swiss TV that there were "strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof".

      Ms Del Ponte did not rule out the possibility that government forces might also have used chemical weapons.

      Later, the commission stressed that it had "not reached conclusive findings" as to their use by any parties.

      "As a result, the commission is not in a position to further comment on the allegations at this time," a statement added.

      The BBC's Imogen Foulkes in Geneva says the statement was terse and shows that the UN was taken by surprise at Ms Del Ponte's remarks.

      The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria was established in August 2011 to examine alleged violations of human rights in the Syrian uprising. It is due to issue its latest report next month.

      The referenced report is the one I linked to above

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site