Skip to main content

View Diary: BREAKING: Verified Voting Senate hearing, unpublicized, untelevised, convenes (138 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Gosh. But wouldn't.. (4.00)
    Gosh, wouldn't that just mean that the polling site would need more machines?  Wouldn't that increase sales?  At the very least, machines with printers would likely cost more.

    Why would Diebold be against this?

    Gosh.  I just don't understand.

    </sarcasm>

    "You're either with us or against us in the war on terror." - George W. Bush
    "Only a Sith deals in absolutes." - Obi Wan Kenobi

    by Stymnus on Tue Jun 21, 2005 at 08:30:25 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Diebold loses ... (none)
      Diebold's behind the 8-ball on the paper trails issue. They lose their political and financial advantage if everyone adopts paper verified systems.  

      Clark County, NV uses many AVC Edge machines from Sequoia Voting Systems, who implemented a paper trail mechanism for last year's elections. The machines were so impressive Nevada's Republican Secretary of State Dean Heller wants the whole state to use them for 2006.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site