Skip to main content

View Diary: Is someone now trying to convince me that this farce was deliberate? (795 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm sure they didn't plan to lose the vote in (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sidnora, grover, AoT

    Parliament. But I would be surprised if all of this were genuine, unscripted gaffes. Very surprised indeed. That's not like the extremely message-controlled Obama administration at all.

    The party of Kennedy is also the party of Eastland. The party of Javits is also the party of Goldwater. Where is our party? Where is the political party that will make it unnecessary to march on Washington?

    by SouthernLiberalinMD on Tue Sep 10, 2013 at 09:49:04 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  No, it's not. (9+ / 0-)

      But they were already walking Kerry's statement back when the Russians took up the offer. Do you think that was planned?

      Even very careful people make mistakes sometimes.

      "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself."........ "The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." (yeah, same guy.)

      by sidnora on Tue Sep 10, 2013 at 10:29:07 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  That is true. And of course, I'm not sure. (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        nuclear winter solstice

        What I'm pretty sure is not a mistake or gaffe is the good-cop/bad-cop game being played by Obama and to a lesser extent Hagel, on the one hand, and Kerry on the other.

        The Kerry chem weapons remark--I'm not really sure. B/c on the one hand the Obama Admin. started walking it back. But on the other, supposedly Obama discussed the possibility with Putin at the G-20. So I don't know.

        The party of Kennedy is also the party of Eastland. The party of Javits is also the party of Goldwater. Where is our party? Where is the political party that will make it unnecessary to march on Washington?

        by SouthernLiberalinMD on Tue Sep 10, 2013 at 10:33:28 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  If it was a plan, why wouldn't the admin (6+ / 0-)

          propose this with his big stick? Afterall, that is the carrot and stick approach.

          but instead, what some would like us to swallow is:

          The Plan:

          1. Meet at ssummit
          2. US Admin calls for really really really limited strikes, that world doesn't want.
          3. Send SOS out to make a gaffe.
          4. Walk back gaffe.
          5. Have Russia make diplomatic suggestion
          6. Have Syria agree
          7. Have President and SOS doubt sincerity
          8. Have President and SOS cautiously agree to it.
          9. Now have Admin claim this was the plan all along

          actually, that looks like a ridiculous and needlessly complicated plan.

          Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell. --Edward Abbey

          by greenbastard on Tue Sep 10, 2013 at 10:46:53 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  That's always how 11D Chess goes (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            aliasalias, AoT, Johnny Q

            It's always a needlessly convoluted and ridiculous plan that could have been done in a far simpler and more direct manner if it was actually the plan.

            Banking on the American people to be able to sort all this out and declare the adult in the room the winner is a very big bet. -Digby

            by Boogalord on Tue Sep 10, 2013 at 11:18:13 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (124)
  • Community (62)
  • Bernie Sanders (44)
  • Elections (33)
  • Hillary Clinton (27)
  • 2016 (27)
  • Climate Change (26)
  • Culture (26)
  • Civil Rights (23)
  • Environment (22)
  • Science (21)
  • Spam (17)
  • Labor (17)
  • Law (17)
  • Media (17)
  • Republicans (17)
  • Barack Obama (16)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (15)
  • White House (14)
  • International (13)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site