Skip to main content

View Diary: The Surveillance State As Foucault's Panopticon (327 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Not CT (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kharma

    You are not the diary police and your HR is ABUSIVE.

    Knock that crap off, and remove the donut.

    Sheesh.

    “Vote for the party closest to you, but work for the movement you love.” ~ Thom Hartmann 6/12/13

    by ozsea1 on Wed Sep 11, 2013 at 10:16:03 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Uprate it if you disagree with me. (0+ / 0-)
    •  Actually, 9-11 conspiracy theories are bannable (4+ / 0-)

      ... offenses here and have been for years.

      Calling other DKos members "weenies" is a personal insult and therefore against site rules.

      by Bob Johnson on Wed Sep 11, 2013 at 11:41:29 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Original comment was not CT (0+ / 0-)

        not even close.

        HR abuse reported. Let the admins decide.

        “Vote for the party closest to you, but work for the movement you love.” ~ Thom Hartmann 6/12/13

        by ozsea1 on Wed Sep 11, 2013 at 11:59:30 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Um, but this comment certainly was: (5+ / 0-)

          And I believe this is the comment that Yoshimi HRed:

          i think the video put out by international architects and engineers poses many questions that were certainly never answered and in some cases never asked.
          "Many questions that certainly were never answered?" Really?

          That conspiracy theory bullshit has been debunked over and over and over, yet idiot truthers are still out there pushing that pablum. That's a bannable comment here.

          Calling other DKos members "weenies" is a personal insult and therefore against site rules.

          by Bob Johnson on Wed Sep 11, 2013 at 12:07:23 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  dissent, commenter was clever (0+ / 0-)

            and kept the language deliberately vague.

            Markos stated explicitly that the benefit of the doubt goes to the commenter; and in this example, no matter how much you assert otherwise, there is sufficient vagueness such that the "benefit of the doubt" goes to the commenter.

            Dismissed.

            “Vote for the party closest to you, but work for the movement you love.” ~ Thom Hartmann 6/12/13

            by ozsea1 on Wed Sep 11, 2013 at 12:14:13 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site