Skip to main content

View Diary: The Surveillance State As Foucault's Panopticon (327 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  dissent, commenter was clever (0+ / 0-)

    and kept the language deliberately vague.

    Markos stated explicitly that the benefit of the doubt goes to the commenter; and in this example, no matter how much you assert otherwise, there is sufficient vagueness such that the "benefit of the doubt" goes to the commenter.


    “Vote for the party closest to you, but work for the movement you love.” ~ Thom Hartmann 6/12/13

    by ozsea1 on Wed Sep 11, 2013 at 12:14:13 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site