Skip to main content

View Diary: In wake of latest mass shooting, senators call for an investigation ... but not about guns (63 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Setting aside the snark (0+ / 0-)

    My comment wasn't a professional clinical assessment, and it was less an assessment of mass shooters' membership in the NRA as it was an indictment of those NRA supporters who defend the rights of these shooters to have accessed the weapons that they did.

    That said, when I hear NRA supporters claim that their right/justification to own guns is based on their perceived need to be able to defend themselves from an "oppressive government" I think I can safely put them down in the Paranoid Delusional camp without having to find a link to a scientific study backing this up, as well as feel justified in my belief that there's no practical assessment for "mental health" that they would consider an acceptable reason to restrict anyone's access to guns.

    The polls don't tell us how a candidate is doing, the polls tell us how the media is doing.

    by Thumb on Wed Sep 18, 2013 at 03:11:21 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Maybe it depends on where one hangs out. (0+ / 0-)
      feel justified in my belief that there's no practical assessment for "mental health" that they would consider an acceptable reason to restrict anyone's access to guns.
      You have obviously met very different NRA members than I have over the years. I think few that I've met wouldn't support a firearms possession restriction on those adjudged to currently be mentally ill (perhaps limited to diagnoses that tend to be correlated with violence against others and those that are not managed reliably through medication) through a legal process.
      when I hear NRA supporters claim that their right/justification to own guns is based on their perceived need to be able to defend themselves from an "oppressive government" I think I can safely put them down in the Paranoid Delusional camp
      Speaking as a supporter of the Second Amendment (although I'd entertain repealing it or amending it) along with all the other parts of the Constitution, I would simply say that it's just as reasonable to reword that this way:
      when I hear ACLU supporters claim that their right/justification for their email not to be snooped on by the government is based on their perceived need to be able to avoid retribution from an "oppressive government" I think I can safely put them down in the Paranoid Delusional camp
      Of course I also reject the reworded "quote" (and would not entertain amending or repealing the Fourth Amendment to make such government snooping clearly acceptable).

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site