Skip to main content

View Diary: What an Embarrassment (156 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Okay, I'll assume that. Then everyone should (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    LaEscapee, poligirl, triv33, corvo

    be grateful and wait and wait and wait.

    Tell me again why someone has to create an account and go through hell to find out what the costs for them will be?

    Why the hell do I have to confirm where I used to live?

    What's wrong with just putting in someone's age, how many people are in their family, their ages, what their income is, and then finding how what it will cost them?

    Why does anyone have to create an account now until they're ready to actually sign up for it to find out the costs?  Why?  What's the point?

    •  Alphabets are curious agencies (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      poligirl

      What's the over and under of me being accused of CT?

      •  CT has a new meaning these days and times. (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        LaEscapee, poligirl
      •  I would say more, but I'm not allowed to if (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        LaEscapee, poligirl, corvo

        I want to remain a member here.

        •  I have less than two years to live, (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          poligirl, corvo

          so I'll say it...

          This site is overrun with a bunch of true believers who swarm like killer bees when any threat to the President's reputation for awesome goodness is detected.

          Fuck this noise. i don't give a rat's ass if I get banned.

          The Dem base has been played by the Dem PTB. Obama willfully rescued the Republicans' sorry asses in 2009, and today the resolvable problems of five years ago are virtually intractable now.

          Well played, Mr. President. I just hope some day you'll come to realize how badly you fucked us all over.

          This site's stated mission is absurdly contradictory. You don't get better Democrats by electing more Democrats. The latter is achieved by lowering the bar, not by raising it.

          by WisePiper on Wed Oct 09, 2013 at 12:40:56 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  that's another new annoying... (4+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        LaEscapee, triv33, PhilJD, poligirl

        thing around here. I swear it's just one big conspiracy  to piss me off and make me do more drugs. i think my dealers are in on it.

        I sing praises in the church of nonsense, but in my heart I'm still an atheist, demanding sense of all things.

        by jbou on Tue Oct 08, 2013 at 09:48:12 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  The correct gambling term would be "moneyline". (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        LaEscapee

        Moneyline is gambling speak for odds. Over/Under... or the total, is a bet on the score of a game or total number of events which might happen.

        For a total bet to exist in the context of this discussion, you would have to propose, say... a specific number of people accusing you of CT.

        The way you worded it, you are asking me to determine what the odds are that someone will accuse you of CT. I'd open the line at -2000. That means you must risk $2000 to win $100, because it's very likely that this will happen.

        You can do whatever you want to us, but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America.

        by Eric Stratton on Tue Oct 08, 2013 at 10:12:11 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site