Skip to main content

View Diary: Breaking: Tea Party Rules Committee Denies Boehner Rule (142 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  No, House ReThugs changed the rules Sept 30. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    a2nite, jbob, PinHole

    The existing rule re discharge petition was:

    When the stage of disagreement has been reached on a bill or resolution with House or Senate amendments, a motion to dispose of any amendment shall be privileged.
    That means (when) the chambers are deadlocked and any member trying to break the deadlock would be able to do so—would have privilege to do so. Except that in this case, for this continuing resolution only, Republicans changed the rule.

    They did it on the night of September 30, the eve of the shutdown, in a Rules Committee meeting. The rule change said that any motion to take up the Senate bill "may be offered only by the majority Leader or his designee." Meaning only Eric Cantor or with his approval. Which wasn't going to happen.

    Above from Joan McCarter's Oct 10 post.

    This post has background of House rule change then video of Rep Van Hollen's Oct 12 attempting discharge petition.

    "H. Res 368 changed the Standing Rules of the House of Representatives  last week to prevent anyone who wasn't the Speaker Majority Leader or his designee from bringing the petition up for a vote, thus guaranteeing Democrats had no way to stop the shutdown.

    On October 12, 2013 the Democrats tried to end the Shut Down and learned that Bohener changed the rules, which you can watch in this video:

    Chris Van Hollen, a Democrat, tried to end the Government Shutdown with a Discharge Petition on October 12, 2013, only to learn that the House rules had been changed.

    As of 9pm 8/30/13: RETIRED Pie Warrior. Substance over Sh*t Flinging (as best as I am able) ~ JV

    by JVolvo on Wed Oct 16, 2013 at 01:46:38 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site