Skip to main content

View Diary: National security as the basis for the liberal state (6 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Remember the Peace Dividend? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    DaveinBremerton

    We were on a path of dismantling our Cold War military industrial complex when 9-11 happened.  We have doubled military and intelligence spending since then.  Step one is to cut back to that point, and quickly, then continue on that path.

    National security has little to do with the military.  Indeed, having to use the military is a sign of failure of tending to our national security.  Militaries can win battles, but only diplomats can end a war -- and, most important, prevent one from breaking out in the first place.  The State Department needs more funding to put our diplomats on the ground and in the culture of every nation, coordinating the work of NGOs and international organization to educate everyone -- especially women throughout the world.  Educated people have hope, and a sense of the future.  It is when a people no longer believe there is a future that they turn on each other.  That is the essence of true national security.

    At home, we need to prepare for natural disaster and (highly unlikely, statistically) any attacks in "the homeland" (what an ominous term that is).  We need mass transit sufficient to evacuate any major city within 24 hours, to respond to disaster massively and effectively and to provide local resources sufficient to treat, and, if necessary, evacuate, the whole population of an area to pre-planned places where they have the resources to live and work and thrive -- and prepare to rebuild.

    We need to decentralize our infrastructure so our power systems and medical systems can be resilient in the face of calamity of any kind.  We need to stop arming our police forces with military weapons and integrate them with social services and emergency response resources.  We need to stand down and get rid of the Department of Homeland Security (what a horrible contrivance that whole thing is!), the North American Command of the military and re-establish a strong posse comitas body of law so no President can ever again drain state-level National Guard resources for a foreign adventure in futility ever again.

    We have a lot of creative destruction ahead of us, even more now that we screwed the pooch by using our military in response to 9-11 and elevating international criminals to the status of Enemy of the United States -- a vacuuous and meaningless label that only furthers their criminal elements' goals.  Their jihadists and our jihadists are the only ones who benefit from such evil.

    It is time to re-assess what true national security means and then get to work making it so.  It is not found in weapon systems and standing military forces.  It is only found in a decentralized, resilient sense of national community in which any calamity which might befall us or our fellow citizens is met with a sincere and effective response in kind with what we would expect if calamity should befall us.  Secure in the knowledge of that assurance, every citizen can pursue happiness, whatever that means to them.  Such assurance gives every citizen a sense of a future in which we can pass along the best fruits of our life work to our progeny.

    A friend of mine into the military empire vision of the nation lamented the Internet was making it impossible to conduct wars since everyone can see on Twitter what our soldiers are doing, and they need to "be able to work in the dark" (as Cheney famously said back in his heydey).  What a pitiful vision of national security that is.  Everything these evil cretins said we should do, we should never do, else our very liberty and national character will be forever condemned to failure.

    Thank you for broaching the subject so few are really discusssing.  It is time to stand down from endless war and false security won by giving up the very things which make this nation secure and prosperous.  It is time to return to the work of the Peace Dividend, and beyond.  

    The time to start was yesterday.

    •  The purpose of a military is not warfare (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      eOz, KafkaWest

      The purpose of a military is to provide a credible threat, and in so doing convince a potential adversary that diplomacy is a better course of action.  Specifically, militaries should:

      (1) Possess enough offensive capability to prevent an adversary from massing or employing military forces.

      (2) Possess enough defensive capability to deter an attack.

      (3) Be agile enough to counter an asymmetric threat.

      (4) Be no larger than necessary to accomplish 1 thru 3.

      (5) Be morally led enough to adhere to international law.

      The problem with the U.S. military is that its civilian leadership sees military power as a suitable alternative to diplomacy.  We don't embrace international law when we should, and we fail to present our own civilian leadership with a credible risk of trial for war crimes.

      "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win". Mohandas K. Gandhi

      by DaveinBremerton on Sat Oct 19, 2013 at 07:05:54 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (129)
  • Community (62)
  • Elections (39)
  • 2016 (37)
  • Environment (36)
  • Bernie Sanders (33)
  • Hillary Clinton (30)
  • Culture (30)
  • Republicans (29)
  • Media (28)
  • Climate Change (27)
  • Education (23)
  • Congress (23)
  • Spam (23)
  • Civil Rights (22)
  • Barack Obama (21)
  • Labor (21)
  • Trans-Pacific Partnership (21)
  • Texas (20)
  • Law (20)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site